We examine the relationship between lean manufacturing practices and environmental performance as measured in terms of air emissions and resource use. We draw on two unique surveys of 31 automobile assembly plants in North America and Japan, which contain information on manufacturing practice and environmental performance, as well as in-depth interviews with 156 plant level employees at 17 assembly plants. Our survey results and interviews suggest that lean management and reduction of air emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are associated negatively. Lean manufacturing practices contribute to more efficient use of paints and cleaning solvents, but these in-process changes are not sufficient to meet the most stringent air regulations. We found some evidence to support the link between lean practices and resource efficiency. While our survey results were in hypothesized direction, they were not statistically significant. In-depth semi-structured interviews, however, suggest a more robust relationship, and we use them to describe some mechanisms by which all three aspects of lean management (buffer minimization, work systems, and human resource management) may be related to environmental management practices and performance. (LEAN MANUFACTURING; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; HIGH-INVOLVEMENT WORK; RESOURCE USE) *

Older primary care patients are more likely to accept collaborative mental health treatment within primary care than in mental health/substance abuse clinics. These results suggest that integrated service arrangements improve access to mental health and substance abuse services for older adults who underuse these services.

No abstract

These findings indicate the need for screening in primary care and for engaging older adults in treatment.

BACKGROUND Recent studies have shown that integrated behavioral health services for older adults in primary care improves health outcomes. No study, however, has asked the opinions of clinicians whose patients actually experienced integrated rather than enhanced referral care for depression and other conditions. METHODThe Primary Care Research in Substance Abuse and Mental Health for the Elderly (PRISM-E) study was a randomized trial comparing integrated behavioral health care with enhanced referral care in primary care settings across the United States. Primary care clinicians at each participating site were asked whether integrated or enhanced referral care was preferred across a variety of components of care. Managers also completed questionnaires related to the process of care at each site.RESULTS Almost all primary care clinicians (n = 127) stated that integrated care led to better communication between primary care clinicians and mental health specialists (93%), less stigma for patients (93%), and better coordination of mental and physical care (92%). Fewer thought that integrated care led to better management of depression (64%), anxiety (76%), or alcohol problems (66%). At sites in which the clinicians were rated as participating in mental health care, integrated care was highly rated as improving communication between specialists in mental health and primary care.CONCLUSIONS Among primary care clinicians who cared for patients that received integrated care or enhanced referral care, integrated care was preferred for many aspects of mental health care. INTRODUCTIONT o address patient, physician, and health system barriers to adequate care of depression and other mental health conditions of late life, innovative models are being tested to enhance the recognition and management of mental health problems in primary care.1-3 The Primary Care Research in Substance Abuse and Mental Health for the Elderly (PRISM-E) study was a multisite effectiveness trial designed to assess the use of a mental health and substance abuse (MH/SA) specialist co-located in the primary care practice to enhance treatment (the integrated care model) and the use of direct referral to specialty care (the enhanced referral model) for older adults with depression, anxiety, or alcohol use problems. We asked the clinicians to offer their perspectives on the specifi c interventions tested in PRISM-E. Given the heterogeneity of how primary care clinicians manage depression, 4 it is important to be aware of systems of care that clinicians Our study differs from previous studies of attitudes of primary care clinicians regarding MH/SA treatment given to patients in primary care. First, most studies have focused on depression, 5-7 whereas we were able to examine several conditions that affect older adults in relation to primary health care. Second, we have focused on the mental health care of older adults, in contrast with other studies that have not considered the specifi c needs of older persons. [5][6][7] Most importantly, unlike stu...