Digital advertising is now a commonplace feature of political communication in the United States. Previous research has documented the key innovations associated with digital political advertising and its consequences for campaigns and elections. However, a comprehensive picture of political spending on digital advertising remains elusive because of the challenges associated with accessing and analyzing data. We address this challenge with a unique dataset (N=3,639,166) derived from over 13 million expenditure records reported to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) between 2004 and 2020. Employing a machine learning model to classify expenditures into nine categories including digital ads and services, this paper makes four key observations. First, 2020 was a watershed election in the growth of digital campaign spending. Second, there are clear partisan differences in the resources allocated to digital advertising. Third, platform companies play a central role in an otherwise partisan market for digital ads and services. Fourth, digital platforms and consultants occupy a distinct ideological niche within each party.
We apply statistical techniques from natural language processing to a collection of Western and Hong Kong-based English-language newspaper articles spanning the years 1998-2020, studying the difference and evolution of its portrayal. We observe that both content and attitudes differ between Western and Hong Kong-based sources. ANOVA on keyword frequencies reveals that Hong Kong-based papers discuss protests and democracy less often. Topic modeling detects salient aspects of protests and shows that Hong Kong-based papers made fewer references to police violence during the Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill Movement. Diachronic shifts in word embedding neighborhoods reveal a shift in the characterization of salient keywords once the Movement emerged. Together these raise questions about the existence of anodyne reporting from Hong Kong-based media. Likewise, they illustrate the importance of sample selection for protest event analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.