Through the past several years, the emphasis in education has shifted from a teachercentered to a learner-centered approach. Traditional teaching has too often been based on a passive lecture model, dependent on an expert teacher who funnels knowledge into the somewhat retentive minds of students. More current learning theory suggests a different role for teachers-that of facilitators. Based on research about how people learn, this article advocates that teachers use more active, inductive instruction in the classroom and demonstrates a student-centered approach using classroom examples implemented in a required, college-level business communication course.
The plasma glucose and plasma immunoreactive insulin concentrations of twelve healthy, nonobese, adult subjects were compared following administration of oral glucose loads of 50, 75 and 100 gm., and 1.75 gm./kg. body weight. The time -of occurrence and the magnitude of maximal plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were unaffected by the 25 gm. increases in glucose load. The 50 gm. glucose load gave the smallest plasma glucose response during the three-hour tests and this response was statistically distinguishable from the plasma glucose responses due to the 100 gm. and 1.75 gm./kg. loads (p < 0.05). The plasma glucose responses due to the other loads did not differ from each other. Insulin responses, estimated by either summing all the plasma insulin values or by measuring the areas under the curves, increased approximately 35 per cent with the first 25 gm. glucose load increment (50 to 75 gm.) and 27 per cent with the second 25 gm. load increment (75 to 100 gm.) during the three-hour study. The differences in insulin responses between the 50 gm. load and the 100 gm. or 1.75 gm./kg. loads were highly significant (p < 0.01) while the difference between the insulin responses following the 75 gm. and 1.75 gm./kg. loads had lower significance (p < 0.05). Differences in insulin responses of the other loads were not significant. Increases in glucose loads above 120 gm. did not further increase the insulin response. This provides evidence that maximal insulin responses provoked by an oral glycemic stimulus alone in subjects are achieved with 100 gm. A wide range was observed in the plasma insulin concentrations among these healthy individuals for any given load, at any one time, and was probably due to biological variation.The fact that incremental changes in glucose load particularly influenced plasma glucose and insulin concentrations relatively late in the glucose tolerance tests, and that mean insulin peak concentrations did not differ, indicates that increasing glucose load results in a more prolonged insulinogenic stimulus rather than the acute release of greater quantities of insulin relatively abruptly. These studies provide evidence that the response associated with increasing glucose load is to some extent a function of the quantity of glucose ingested, and that the significant increases in insulin response commonly occur in association with concurrent alterations in plasma glucose concentrations. The results also indicate that the 50 gm. glucose load results in a different plasma glucose response than does the 100 gm. and 1.75 gm./kg. loads and consequently requires different criteria for interpretation of glucose tolerance testing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.