Mycobacterium tuberculosis can be transmitted via organ donation and result in severe outcomes. To better understand donor-derived tuberculosis (DDTB), all potential transmissions reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee between 2008 and 2018 were analyzed. Among 51 total reports, nine (17%) (9 donors/35 recipients) had ≥ 1 recipient with proven/probable disease transmission. Of these, eight were reported due to recipient disease, and one was reported due to a positive donor result.Proven/probable DDTB transmissions were reported in six lung and five nonlung recipients. The median time to diagnosis was 104 days posttransplant (range 0-165 days).Pulmonary TB, extrapulmonary TB, pulmonary plus extrapulmonary TB, and asymptomatic TB infection with positive interferon-gamma release assay were present in five, three, one, and two recipients, respectively. All recipients received treatment and survived except for one whose death was not attributed to TB. All donors associated with proven/probable DDTB had ≥ 1 TB risk factor. Six were born in a TB-endemic country, five had traveled to a TB-endemic country, three had been incarcerated, and three had latent TB infection. These cases highlight the importance of evaluating donors for TB based on risk factors. Early posttransplant TB in organ recipients of donors with TB risk factors requires prompt reporting to OPTN to identify other potential affected recipients and implement timely treatment interventions.

BackgroundIn the United States, all deceased donors (DD) are evaluated for behavioral risk factors for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B (HBV), and hepatitis C (HCV) infection during the past 12 months. DD with behavioral risk factors or hemodilution are designated as PHS increased risk donors (IRD). Since 2013, the number of IRD has increased from 13.4% of DD to 27% in 2018. Despite a low residual risk of disease transmission after a negative nucleic acid test for HIV/HBV/HCV, the considerable underutilization of IRD has driven an interest in revising the PHS IRD 2013 guidelines. The objective of this study was to describe the epidemiology of IRD with the goal of guiding policy change and maximize organ use.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of DD during 2018. Characteristics of IRD were compared with non-IRD. A random 10% sample of IRD was selected for manual review of text narratives and donor questionnaires submitted by organ procurement organizations to determine specific PHS IRD factors. Categorical variables were compared using the χ 2 test and continuous variables were compared using a 2-sample t-test for independent samples.ResultsAmong 10,721 DD in 2018, 2,904 were designated IRD (27.1%) with regional variability noted (Figure). Compared with non-IRD, IRD were younger (median age 35 vs. 45 years, P < 0.001) and more often died from drug intoxication (33.2 vs. 5.6%, P < 0.001). Hemodilution was found in 6.8% of all IRD and was the only factor for IRD designation in 60% of pediatric donors <12 years old. The random sample of IRD (N = 288) was similar to IRD population for age, gender, ethnicity, cause of death, and region of recovery (table). Descriptive analysis of the random sample showed that intravenous drug use was the most common behavioral risk factor (N = 124, 43.1%), followed by incarceration (N = 108, 37.5%). Most DD met only 1 criterion (N = 179, 62%); 21% met 2 criteria; and 17% had >3 criteria.ConclusionThis study represents the most detailed description of PHS IRD factors since the adoption of the new guidelines in 2013. Understanding the prevalence of factors that lead to IRD designation will help inform future policy development, optimize safe DD use, and increase the number of transplants. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) can be transmitted from organ donor to recipient, but details of transmission events are not widely published. The Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) evaluated 105 cases of potential donor derived transmission events of HBV between 2009‐2017. Proven, probable or possible transmission of HBV occurred in 25 (23.8%) cases. Recipients of liver grafts were most commonly infected (20 of 21 exposed recipients) compared to 9 of 21 exposed non‐hepatic recipients. Eleven of 25 donors were HBV core antibody (HBcAb) positive/HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) negative and infected 8/20 recipients. Of the 10 liver recipients and 1 liver‐kidney recipient who received organs from these donors: six were not given antiviral prophylaxis, two developed infection after antiviral prophylaxis was discontinued, two developed HBV while on lamivudine prophylaxis, one was on antiviral prophylaxis and did not develop HBV viremia or antigenemia. One recipient of a HBcAb positive/HBsAg negative kidney developed active HBV infection. Unexpected donor‐derived transmission of HBV was a rare event in reports to DTAC, but was often detected in the recipient late post‐transplant. Six of 11 recipients (54.5%) of a liver from a HBcAb positive donor did not receive prophylaxis; all of these were potentially preventable with the use of anti‐viral prophylaxis.

Background The Organ Care System (OCS) is a revolutionary ex vivo organ perfusion technology that can potentially expand the organ retrieval range. The OCS Lung device uses packed red blood cells (pRBC) with a proprietary solution. We report the ability to reduce blood waste during this procedure by using a thermal packaging solution in conjunction with the OCS platform. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all OCS Lung recoveries performed by our recovery team, using pRBCfrom May 2019 to January 2021. Initially, units were stored using passive refrigeration with the Performance cooler at a temperature range of 1–6°C for 4 h. Subsequently, thermal control technology with the ProMed cooler was utilized to maintain the same temperature range for 72 h. Results Twenty‐three recoveries were initiated with 63 pRBC. The Performance cooler was used for 8, while the ProMed cooler for 13. 37.5% of pRBC transported with the Performance cooler was used within the validated time range, while 25.0% were used beyond the validated time range based on clinical judgment. In addition, 37.5% of pRBC transported with the Performance cooler were returned to the institution after canceled recoveries with an estimated loss of $1800; the ProMed cooler had no wastage. Conclusions This study showed that using an advanced thermal packaging solution facilitates proper storage of pRBC and represents an advancement for extended donor lung preservation. The elimination of blood wastage in this initial study portends ongoing benefits for the limited blood supply and reduced cost.

No abstract