Identification of modifiable dietary factors, which are involved in the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), could inform strategies to prevent GDM. Therefore, we examined the dietary nutrient patterns and evaluated their relationship with GDM risk in a Chinese population using a case control study design. A total of 1,464 GDM cases and 8,092 non-GDM controls were included in the final analysis. Dietary intake was assessed using a 33-item food frequency questionnaire, and nutrients were estimated using the Chinese Standard Tables of Food Consumption. Dietary nutrient patterns were identified using factor analysis, and their associations with GDM risk were evaluated using unconditional logistic regression models adjusting for total energy intake, maternal age, high blood pressure, education, maternal body mass index (BMI), parity, and family history of diabetes. A “vitamin” nutrient pattern was characterized as the consumption of diet rich in vitamin A, carotene, vitamin B2, vitamin B6, vitamin C, dietary fiber, folate, calcium, and potassium. For every quartile increase in the vitamin factor score during one year prior to conception, the first trimester, and the second trimester of pregnancy, the GDM risk decreased by 9% (OR: 0.91, 95%CI: 0.86-0.96), 9% (OR: 0.91, 95%CI: 0.86-0.96), and 10% (OR: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.85-0.95), respectively. The significant reduced GDM risk was seen in women regardless of age and parity, and slightly stronger effect was found in women whose age≤30 and women who are nulliparous across the three time periods. The significant association was also found in women whose BMI≤24 with similar effect size across the three time periods. Our study suggests that the vitamin nutrient pattern diet is associated with decreased GDM risk. Additional studies are necessary to explore the underlying mechanism of this relationship.
To evaluate the associations among race/ethnicity, route of surgery, and perioperative outcomes for women undergoing hysterectomy for uterine leiomyomas. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Multistate. Patients: Women who underwent hysterectomies for leiomyomas from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, 2014 to 2017. Interventions: None. Exposures of interest were race/ethnicity and route of surgery. Measurements and Main Results: Racial/ethnic variation in route of surgery and perioperative outcomes. Propensity score matching was employed to control for possible confounders. We identified 20 133 women who underwent nonemergent abdominal hysterectomy (AH), laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH), or vaginal hysterectomy (VH) for leiomyomas. We defined minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) as LH or VH. Black women were more likely to have open surgery (AH vs MIH adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.07−2.38; AH vs VH aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.54−2.08; AH vs LH aOR, 2.27; 95% CI, 2.13−2.44) than white women. Likewise, Hispanic women were more likely to have open surgery (AH vs MIH aOR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.58−1.96; AH vs LH aOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.61−2.00) than white women. Black women were more likely to experience any complication after hysterectomy (AH aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.31−1.80; VH aOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.02−2.68; LH aOR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.13−1.66) than white women. Hispanic women were less likely than white women to experience major complications after VH (aOR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08−0.98). Compared with white women, the mean length of stay was longer for black women who underwent AH or LH. The mean total operation time was higher for all minority groups (except for Asian/other undergoing AH) regardless of surgical approach. Conclusion: Women of minority race/ethnicity were more likely to undergo abdominal rather than MIH for leiomyomas. Even when controlling for route of surgery, they were more likely to experience perioperative complications.
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a growing public health concern for many reasons, and its etiology remains unclear. Due to the similarity of its pathophysiology with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), we evaluated the relationship between published T2DM susceptibility genes and the risk of GDM. A total of 303 SNPs from genes including IRS1, IGF2BP2, CDKAL1, GCK, TCF7L2, KCNQ1, and KCNJ11 and the risk of GDM were examined in a nested case-control study with 321 GDM cases and 316 controls. The odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated by unconditional logistical regression as a measure of the associations between genotypes and GDM in additive, recessive, dominant, and codominant models adjusting for maternal age, maternal BMI, parity, and family history of diabetes. At the gene level, CDKAL1 was associated with GDM risk. SNPs in the CDKAL1 gene including rs4712527, rs7748720, rs9350276, and rs6938256 were associated with reduced GDM risk. However, SNPs including rs9295478, rs6935599, and rs7747752 were associated with elevated GDM risk. After adjusting for multiple comparisons, rs9295478 and rs6935599 were still significant across the additive, recessive, and codominant models; rs7748720 and rs6938256 were significant in dominant and codominant models; and rs4712527 was only significant in the codominant model. Our study provides evidence for an association between the CDKAL1 gene and risk of GDM. However, its role in the GDM pathogenesis still needs to be verified by further studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.