No abstract

No abstract

The n-6 and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are essential nutrients; intake of relatively small amounts of these fatty acids prevents nutritional deficiencies. Replacing dietary saturated fat with PUFAs may confer health gains. Experimental data support the notion that high intake of n-6 PUFAs may increase in vivo lipid peroxidation. This effect may be counteracted by dietary antioxidant supplementation. The influence of a high n-3 PUFA intake on measures of lipid peroxidation has been equivocal. In clinical trials, subjects who consumed diets rich in n-6 or n-3 PUFAs had fewer atherothrombotic endpoints than did control groups. In this report, data regarding the influence of PUFAs on lipid peroxidation as well as on cholesterol and glucose metabolism, hemostasis, and other aspects of interest are reviewed and discussed. Currently, daily intake of PUFAs as >10% of total energy is not recommended. Below this ceiling there is little evidence that high dietary intake of n-6 or n-3 PUFAs implies health risks.

BackgroundReduction of infarct size by ischemic postconditioning (IPost) has been reported in smaller proof‐of‐concept clinical studies, but has not been confirmed in other smaller studies. The principle needs to be evaluated in larger groups of ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients before being implemented in clinical practice. This study assessed the effect of ischemic postcoditioning (IPost) on infarct size in patients with STEMI treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods and ResultsPatients with first‐time STEMI, <6 hours from symptom onset, referred to primary PCI were randomized to IPost or control groups. IPost was administered by 4 cycles of 1‐minute reocclusion and 1‐minute reperfusion, starting 1 minute after opening, followed by stenting. In the control group, stenting was performed immediately after reperfusion. The primary endpoint was infarct size measured by cardiac magnetic resonance after 4 months. A total of 272 patients were randomized. Infarct size (percent of left ventricular mass) after 4 months (median values and interquartile range) was 14.4% (7.7, 24.6) and 13.5% (8.1, 19.3) in the control group and IPost group, respectively (P=0.18). No significant impact of IPost was found when controlling for baseline risk factors of infarct size in a multivariate linear regression model (P=0.16). The effects of IPost on secondary endpoints, including markers of necrosis, myocardial salvage, and ejection fraction, as well as adverse cardiac events during follow‐up, were consistently neutral.ConclusionsIn contrast to several smaller trials reported previously, we found no significant effects of IPost on infarct size or secondary study outcomes.Clinical Trial RegistrationURL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT.No.PO1506.

AimsThe calcium sensitizer levosimendan may counteract stunning after reperfusion of ischaemic myocardium, but no randomized placebo-controlled trials exist regarding its use in PCI-treated ST-segment elevation infarction (STEMI). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of levosimendan in patients with a primary PCI-treated STEMI complicated by symptomatic heart failure (HF). Methods and resultsA total of 61 patients developing clinical signs of HF within 48 h after a primary PCI-treated STEMI (including cardiogenic shock) were randomized double-blind to a 25 h infusion of levosimendan or placebo. The primary endpoint was change in wall motion score index (WMSI) from baseline to day 5 measured by echocardiography. There was a significantly larger improvement in WMSI from baseline to day 5 in the levosimendan group compared with placebo (from 1.94 + 0.20 to 1.66 + 0.31 vs. 1.99 + 0.22 to 1.83 + 0.26, respectively, P ¼ 0.031). There were significantly more episodes of hypotension during study drug infusion in the levosimendan group (67% vs. 36%, P ¼ 0.029), but no significant difference in blood pressure at the end of infusion or in use of vasopressors. No significant between-group differences in changes in NT-proBNP levels, clinical composite score, frequency of atrial fibrillation or ventricular arrhythmia, infarct size at 6 weeks, or new clinical events up to 6 months were found. One and four patients died in the levosimendan and placebo group, respectively. ConclusionsLevosimendan treatment improved contractility in post-ischaemic myocardium in patients with PCI-treated STEMI complicated by HF. The treatment was well tolerated, without any increase in arrhythmias. ------------------------------ KeywordsLevosimendan † Acute heart failure † ST-elevation myocardial infarction † Wall motion score index † Myocardial stunning