Objective. To delineate the role of Th17 cells in the pathogenesis of autoimmune arthritides.Methods. Th17 cells were analyzed in well-defined homogeneous cohorts of patients with the prototypical autoimmune arthritides rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), grouped according to patients who had very early active RA (n ‫؍‬ 36; mean disease duration 2.8 months, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints 5.0) and those who had very early active PsA (n ‫؍‬ 20; mean disease duration 2.3 months), none of whom had received treatment with glucocorticoids or diseasemodifying antirheumatic drugs, as well as patients with established RA (n ‫؍‬ 21; mean disease duration 68 months) who were considered either responders or nonresponders to therapy. Groups of healthy individuals and patients with osteoarthritis (a noninflammatory arthritis) were used as control cohorts. Expression of T lineage-specific transcription factors (RORC, T-bet, GATA-3, and FoxP3) and the response of CD4 T cells to Th17 cell-inducing conditions were analyzed in vitro.Results. The frequencies of Th17 cells and levels of interleukin-17 strongly correlated with systemic disease activity at both the onset and the progression of RA or PsA. The values were reduced to control levels in patients with treatment-controlled disease activity.Th17 cells were enriched in the joints, and increased frequencies of synovial Th17 cells expressed CCR4 and CCR6, indicative of selective migration of Th17 cells to the joints. The intrinsically elevated expression of RORC, accompanied by biased Th17 cell development, and the resistance of Th17 cells to a natural cytokine antagonist in patients with RA and patients with PsA were suggestive of the underlying molecular mechanisms of uncontrolled Th17 activity in these patients.Conclusion. Th17 cells play an important role in inflammation in human autoimmune arthritides, both at the onset and in established disease.

Material

Combined immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) provides unprecedented efficacy gains in numerous cancer indications, with PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab plus CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab in advanced melanoma as first-ever approved therapies for combined ICB. However, gains in efficacy must be balanced against a higher frequency and severity of adverse drug reactions (ADR). Because delays in diagnosis and management might result in symptom worsening and further complications, clinicians shall be well trained to identify ADR promptly and monitor patients adequately. This paper reviews safety data assessed by the European Medicines Agency for the anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 combination and provides a literature overview on published case reports for rare ADR with suspected potential underreporting. Incidences and kinetics of immune-related ADR are described. Recommendations for the evaluation and management of ADR are convened by an interdisciplinary expert panel focusing on rare but clinically important side effects arising from combined ICB. Pooled safety data from 1551 patients with advanced melanoma, treated either with 3mg/kg ipilimumab plus 1mg/kg nivolumab (N=407), or nivolumab alone (N=787), or ipilimumab alone (N=357) demonstrate that immune-related ADR occur more frequently for the combination, with a shorter time-to-onset, and tend to be more severe. The majority of events is reversible after systemic use of glucocorticoids, notably methylprednisolone or equivalents; in certain cases of long-lasting and refractory immune toxicities, non-steroidal immunosuppressants may be used, once ICB is interrupted or terminated. Combined ICB has considerable toxicities, therefore close monitoring and high experience in diagnosis and treatment of ADR is necessary.

BackgroundRheumatic and musculoskeletal immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are observed in about 10% of patients with cancer receiving checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Given the recent emergence of these events and the lack of guidance for rheumatologists addressing them, a European League Against Rheumatism task force was convened to harmonise expert opinion regarding their identification and management.MethodsFirst, the group formulated research questions for a systematic literature review. Then, based on literature and using a consensus procedure, 4 overarching principles and 10 points to consider were developed.ResultsThe overarching principles defined the role of rheumatologists in the management of irAEs, highlighting the shared decision-making process between patients, oncologists and rheumatologists. The points to consider inform rheumatologists on the wide spectrum of musculoskeletal irAEs, not fulfilling usual classification criteria of rheumatic diseases, and their differential diagnoses. Early referral and facilitated access to rheumatologist are recommended, to document the target organ inflammation. Regarding therapeutic, three treatment escalations were defined: (1) local/systemic glucocorticoids if symptoms are not controlled by symptomatic treatment, then tapered to the lowest efficient dose, (2) conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, in case of inadequate response to glucocorticoids or for steroid sparing and (3) biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, for severe or refractory irAEs. A warning has been made on severe myositis, a life-threatening situation, requiring high dose of glucocorticoids and close monitoring. For patients with pre-existing rheumatic disease, baseline immunosuppressive regimen should be kept at the lowest efficient dose before starting immunotherapies.ConclusionThese statements provide guidance on diagnosis and management of rheumatic irAEs and aim to support future international collaborations.