SUMMARYAim: To determine the prevalence, symptom pattern and impact of the irritable bowel syndrome, across eight European countries, using a standardized methodology. Methods: A community survey of 41 984 individuals was performed using quota sampling and random digit telephone dialling to identify those with diagnosed irritable bowel syndrome or those meeting diagnostic criteria, followed by in-depth interviews. Results: The overall prevalence was 11.5% (6.2-12%); 9.6% had current symptoms, 4.8% had been formally diagnosed and a further 2.9%, 4.2% and 6.5% met the Rome II, Rome I or Manning criteria, respectively. Bowel habit classification varied by criteria: 63% had an 'alternating' bowel habit by Rome II vs. 21% by selfreport. On average, 69% reported symptoms lasting for 1 h, twice daily, for 7 days a month. Irritable bowel syndrome sufferers reported more peptic ulcer (13% vs. 6%), reflux (21% vs. 7%) and appendectomy (17% vs. 11%), but not hysterectomy, cholecystectomy or bladder procedures. Ninety per cent had consulted in primary care and 17% in hospital; 69% had used medication. Irritable bowel syndrome substantially interfered with lifestyle and caused absenteeism. Conclusions: Irritable bowel syndrome is common with major effects on lifestyle and health care. The majority of cases are undiagnosed and the prevalence varies strikingly between countries. Diagnostic criteria are associated with varying prevalences and bowel habit sub-types. This limits their utility in clinical practice and the transferability of research findings using them.

No abstract

up to 48 weeks. RESULTS: At end of treatment, 73.5% of patients receiving BOT 0.5 mg twice daily and 75% receiving BOT 1.0 mg twice daily were in persistent remission compared with 4.4% of patients in the placebo group (P < .001 for both comparisons of BOT with placebo). Median time to relapse in the placebo group was 87 days. The frequency of adverse events was similar in the BOT and placebo groups. Morning serum levels of cortisol were in the normal range at baseline and did not significantly change during treatment. Four patients receiving BOT developed asymptomatic, low serum levels of cortisol. Clinically manifested candidiasis was suspected in 16.2% of patients in the BOT 0.5 mg group and in 11.8% of patients in the BOT 1.0 mg group; all infections resolved with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In a phase 3 trial, up to 48 weeks of treatment with BOT (0.5 mg or 1.0 mg twice daily) was superior to placebo in maintaining remission of EoE. Both dosages were equally effective and well tolerated. EudraCT number; 2014-001485-99; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02434029.

SUMMARYBackground: The role of 5-hydroxytryptamine in the control of gastric fundus tone in humans is still unknown. Selective 5-hydroxytryptamine re-uptake inhibitors act both centrally and peripherally to enhance the availability of physiologically released 5-hydroxytryptamine. Aim: To study the influence of a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine re-uptake inhibitor, paroxetine, on gastric fundus tone, on the perception to gastric distension and on gastric accommodation to a meal. Methods: Sixteen healthy volunteers underwent a gastric barostat study on two occasions, after pre-treatment with placebo or paroxetine, 20 mg ⁄ day. Graded isobaric and isovolumetric distensions were performed and perception was scored by a questionnaire. Subsequently, the amplitude of the gastric accommodation to a mixed liquid meal was also measured.

INTRODUCTION:Body surface gastric mapping (BSGM) is a new noninvasive test of gastric function. BSGM offers several novel and improved biomarkers of gastric function capable of differentiating patients with overlapping symptom profiles. The aim of this study was to define normative reference intervals for BSGM spectral metrics in a population of healthy controls.METHODS:BSGM was performed in healthy controls using Gastric Alimetry (Alimetry, New Zealand) comprising a stretchable high-resolution array (8 × 8 electrodes; 196 cm2), wearable Reader, and validated symptom-logging App. The evaluation encompassed a fasting baseline (30 minutes), 482 kCal meal, and 4-hour postprandial recording. Normative reference intervals were calculated for BSGM metrics including the Principal Gastric Frequency, Gastric Alimetry Rhythm Index (a measure of the concentration of power in the gastric frequency band over time), body mass index (BMI)–adjusted amplitude (μV), and fed:fasted amplitude ratio. Data were reported as median and reference interval (5th and/or 95th percentiles).RESULTS:A total of 110 subjects (55% female, median age 32 years [interquartile range 24–50], median BMI 23.8 kg/m2 [interquartile range 21.4–26.9]) were included. The median Principal Gastric Frequency was 3.04 cycles per minute; reference interval: 2.65–3.35 cycles per minute. The median Gastric Alimetry Rhythm Index was 0.50; reference interval: ≥0.25. The median BMI-adjusted amplitude was 37.6 μV; reference interval: 20–70 μV. The median fed:fasted amplitude ratio was 1.85; reference interval ≥1.08. A higher BMI was associated with a shorter meal-response duration (P = 0.014).DISCUSSION:This study provides normative reference intervals for BSGM spectral data to inform diagnostic interpretations of abnormal gastric function.