From this study, we concluded that the use of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline is as effective as inferior alveolar nerve block with lignocaine but without the risk of attendant adverse effects of inferior alveolar nerve block technique.
Objective In panfacial fracture management, the controversy still exists in the sequencing of fixation. The purpose of this systematic review is to establish the best sequence pattern which assists in achieving definite facial width, vertical height and anteroposterior projection. Methods The review was conducted according to the ''Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses'' (PRISMA) guidelines. Two independent authors performed a comprehensive search of the PUBMED, EBSCO, J-Gate, SCOPUS and NDH for articles published up until December 2018. Sequence of fixation, timing of intervention, outcome, follow-up period and complications were evaluated for patients with panfacial fracture. Results In total, 202 articles were identified from the databases. After screening and full text analysis, 25 studies were included in this systematic review. Nineteen studies reported bottom-to-top sequence and two studies reported top-to-bottom approach. However, four studies reported both the approaches. The follow-up period ranges from 3 weeks to 4 years. Conclusion Based on the literature support and evidence, good and satisfactory outcome achieved in ''Bottom-top and outside-in'' sequence when compared with other sequence pattern. Early repair of panfacial fracture is advised for proper reduction and fixation, but can be delayed in accompanying life-threatening injuries.Complications are perceptible in all the sequences; it can be avoided by definitive treatment planning and stepwise management.
Introduction: Accurate evaluation of change in orbital volume occurring due to trauma is of paramount importance to achieve an optimal final outcome. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess and evaluate the orbital volume both radiological and clinical means for accurate surgical correction. Aim: To assess the final surgical outcome using standardized clinical and radiological tools perioperatively to restore orbital volume in patients with orbital wall fractures. Materials and Methods: A prospective interventional study of patients with unilateral orbital wall fractures which was carried out for 24 months. A thorough clinical evaluation and ophthalmological assessments including visual acuity, field of vision was performed. All patients had HRCT for volumetric assessment and assessed clinically for enophthalmos using Hertel exophthalmometer. Based on the level of enophthalmos and orbital volume change, treatment plan was formulated. Intraoperatively Hertel exophthalmometer is used to correct the predetermined enophthalmos. Postoperatively the patients are followed-up at designated intervals to assess the surgical outcome. RESULT: Road Traffic Accident (RTA) was the common etiology of orbital fractures which accounts for 84.1% (n=53) and the most common clinical sign was enophthalmos which accounted for 76.2% (n=48). The mean and standard deviation of orbital volume is 35.20 ± 4.21 and change in orbital volume is 4.29±2.76. The mean and standard deviation were calculated for all patients in different time intervals. The result showed a statistically significant difference in pre-operative phase, intra-operative phase and it maintained throughout the postoperative phase. CONCLUSION: In our study we have found that meticulous preoperative and intraoperative tools to assess in orbital reconstruction gives a desired surgical outcome. Hertel exophthalmometer and HRCT based 3D reconstructed volumetric analysis can be an excellent tool to evaluate anteroposterior globe malposition and volume change.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.