Key Points The prevalence of MBL among blood donors is much higher than previously reported. Although uncommon, higher-risk MBL phenotypes and genotypes were observed.

Summary Monoclonal B‐cell populations have been detected in the peripheral blood of apparently healthy individuals by flow cytometry. In 2005, the term monoclonal B‐cell lymphocytosis (MBL) was proposed to describe these findings. MBL may be immunophenotypically similar to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and, like CLL, the prevalence is higher in males and older individuals. We studied the prevalence of MBL in blood donors from the Midwestern United States. Samples from 5141 donors were examined and seven (0·14%) were found to have immunophenotypic characteristics of MBL or CLL. Immunoglobulin heavy chain analysis yielded monoclonality or oligoclonality. Prior and subsequent to the study, an additional undetermined number of blood donors were screened and seven of these expressed immunophenotypic characteristics of MBL or CLL. We thus found a total of 14 healthy blood donors with monoclonal expansions of B‐lymphocyte populations. Of these, 12 were presumptively classified as MBL and two as CLL. All but two of the donors were male; the mean age was 59 years. The clinical importance of these findings with regard to transfusion medicine has not been established.

The immature platelet fraction (IPF) as determined by the Sysmex XE-2100 is a rapid automated measure of the least mature component of the platelet population and is thought to correlate with thrombopoietic activity of the marrow. We investigated the ability of IPF to predict platelet recovery following hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation. IPF was compared to standard parameters of hematopoietic recovery, including the immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF), an early predictor of recovery. Fifty patients undergoing peripheral blood HPC transplantation (38 autologous and 12 allogeneic) were followed daily for 11 to 28 days after transplantation with measurement of IPF, IRF, absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) and platelet counts. Mean days to recovery for IPF was 3.1 days less than for platelet count (P <.0001), 3.8 days less than for ANC (P <.0001), and 0.6 days less than for IRF (P = .0477). IPF recovered at least 1 day prior to platelet count in 79% (38 of 48) of patients, and was followed by platelet count recovery within 1 to 12 days (mean, 4.1 days). When autologous and allogeneic patient groups were analyzed separately, IPF recovered significantly earlier than platelet count and ANC in both groups (P <.0001). Thrombopoietin (TPO) levels in 5 patients receiving transplants correlated with IPF; however, this appeared to be secondary to an inverse correlation of both TPO and IPF with platelet count. IPF is comparable to IRF as one of the earliest predictors of hematopoietic recovery following peripheral blood HPC transplantation. IPF could potentially be useful as a predictor of platelet recovery in other bone marrow failure syndromes.

A solid phase red blood cell adherence method has been used for platelet antibody detection and crossmatching for refractory platelet recipients. Patient sera were first screened for HLA or platelet-specific antibodies, then crossmatched with potential apheresis platelet donors. The overall correlation of platelet crossmatch results with transfusion outcome was 97% in patients with no evidence of nonimmune platelet destruction. The solid phase red blood cell adherence method provided a feasible and effective alternative to HLA matching as a means of donor selection for refractory platelet recipients. The speed and simplicity of this method may allow most hospital laboratories to perform platelet antibody screening before routine platelet transfusions.