Collaborative manufacturing, a growing competitive structure for manufacturing companies and government agencies, is based on flexible design and production processes, with multiple companies pooling strengths on a product-by-product basis to create distributed collaborative corporations. This experimental research uses a sociotechnical theory as a framework to explore differences in engineering design team decision making as a function of various media of communication. Results indicate that design teams communicating via an electronic medium perceive an increase in mental workload and interact less frequently, but for a greater total amount of time. No evidence was found to suggest that face-to-face teams spend a greater proportion of their time discussing design issues or alternatives than do their dispersed counterparts. Realizing that critical decisions throughout design have a tremendous effect on cost, time to production, and overall quality, the study's results lead to broad implications and suggestions for the management of distributed design teams.
The movement toward distributed collaborative work groups or virtual teams by organizations has initiated a myriad of questions specific to human factors research. Distributed team members, linked through technological interfaces, may vary in location, discipline, company loyalties, and culture. While virtual teams are necessary in this environment of time compression, distributed resources, increasing dependence on knowledge-based input, and the integration of information and telecommunication technologies, there is an increasing need to understand factors influencing distributed work group performance. Communication research has demonstrated that as communication signals are narrowed by medium restraints, the communication process changes and group members adopt new communication strategies. This study hypothesized that a group's mental workload would increase as the communication bandwidth was constrained. Results show that audio and video groups did not perceive significantly different overall workloads; however, both exceeded that of face-to-face groups.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.