No abstract

Background: Little is known about post-stroke depression in patients with lacunar stroke due to cerebral small vessel disease. Our objectives were to describe the prevalence of depression, its correlates and to examine the course of depression over time in a cohort of patients with lacunar stroke, the majority of whom had mild functional disability. Methods: Depression was determined in participants in the international Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes (SPS3) trial which is testing antiplatelet therapies and targets of blood pressure control in patients with lacunar strokes and assessing stroke recurrence and cognitive decline. Depression was evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to examine the relationship between the covariates of interest and depression. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the likelihood of depression over time, while accounting for the multiple measurements within each subject. Results: The prevalence of depression in 2,477 participants at approximately 4 months after stroke was 19%. Older age (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.96–0.99), male gender (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.48–0.80) and less cognitive impairment (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.98–1.00) were independently associated with a lower risk of depression. Functional disability (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.3–2.4), living with a spouse/family (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.1–2.3) and risk factors for stroke (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.0–1.3) were each independently associated with a higher risk of depression. Longitudinal modeling indicated that the likelihood of depression decreased by 1.12 times (95% CI 1.06–1.17) for each 1-year increase in time. Conclusions: One fifth of those in the SPS3 trial cohort reported depression that is sustained over time. Although this is lower than the prevalence reported for stroke in general, these results underscore the importance of early screening for post-stroke depression, treatment and follow-up to minimize the negative consequences associated with depression.

Background and Relevance: Atherosclerotic stenosis of the major intracranial arteries is an important cause of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke. Of the 900,000 patients who suffer a TIA or stroke each year in the USA, intracranial stenosis is responsible for approximately 10%, i.e. 90,000 patients. There have been no prospective trials evaluating antithrombotic therapies for preventing recurrent vascular events in these patients. The main objective of this trial is to compare warfarin [International Normalized Ratio (INR) 2–3] with aspirin (1,300 mg/day) for preventing stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic) and vascular death in patients presenting with TIA or stroke caused by stenosis of a major intracranial artery. Study Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. The sample sizerequired will be 403 patients per group, based on stroke and vascular death rates of 33% per 3 years in the aspirin group vs. 22% per 3 years in the warfarin group, a p value of 0.05, power of 80%, a 24% rate of ‘withdrawal of therapy’, and a 1% rate of ‘lost to follow-up’. Conduct of Trial: Patients with TIA or nondisabling stroke caused by ≧50% stenosis of a major intracranial artery documented by catheter angiography are randomized to warfarin or aspirin. Patients are contacted monthly by phone and examined every 4 months until a common termination date. Mean follow-up in the study is expected to be 3 years. Conclusion: This study will determine whether warfarin or aspirin is superior for patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Furthermore, it will identify patients whose rate of ischemic stroke in the territory of the stenotic intracranial artery on best medical therapy is sufficiently high to justify a subsequent trial comparing intracranial angioplasty/stenting with best medical therapy in this subset of patients.

No abstract

This study evaluated the role of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in detecting extra- or intracranial vascular disease in 118 patients with brain infarction and the accuracy of MRA diagnosis when compared with conventional angiography in patients who had both investigations. Magnetic resonance angiography ruled out extra- and intracranial large vessel disease in 36% of the patients. MRA also demonstrated extra- or intracranial disease in 56% (probably symptomatic in 31, possibly symptomatic in 18, and asymptomatic in 17 patients), and provided no information in 8% of the 118 patients. Among the 176 major vessels visualized by both MRA and conventional angiography, conventional angiography confirmed the presence of 9/10 extracranial and 32/40 intracranial large vessel abnormalities detected on MRA. There were two false-negative findings on MRA: occlusion of a distal branch of middle cerebral artery, and an asymptomatic posterior cerebral artery stenosis. Magnetic resonance angiography is a clinically useful method for screening extra- and intracranial disease in patients with brain infarction and selecting high-yield patients for conventional angiography.