Although mayfly swarms are frequently cited as an example of lekking by insects, little is known about the behaviour of individuals within a swarm, or how mate‐selection takes place. A study of five species of mayfly over a period of 10 consecutive years has revealed species‐specific differences in the flight pattern of swarming males and in the ability of males to recognize swarms of their own species. Males of four of the five species jostle other males in the swarm at all times except when mating: mating pairs are not jostled. The pattern of jostling varies with the species. Measurements of the sperm content of the vesicula seminalis and of the wing length of members of individual swarms show that larger wing size is positively correlated with the presence of less sperm. The vesicula seminalis is always filled with sperm at the beginning of the imaginal stage and the testes regress before the beginning of the imaginal stage. If the volume of sperm in the vesicula seminalis is a valid index of mating success then males with larger wings have the highest success. Large wings may bestow an advantage during jostling. The males of Ephemera danica, which do not jostle, glide with outspread wings; these outspread wings may attract females, the largest wings being the most attractive. Females of all five species enter the swarm a few at a time, although many females may be resting beneath the swarm. This phased entry may decrease the attraction of the swarm for predators. The number of females in a swarm is not correlated with swarm size, and the factors which enable females to regulate their entry into a swarm remain obscure.
1. From a single founder virgin female of each species, nine and seven successive parthenogenetic generations of Cloeon dipterum and Cloeon simile, respectively, were reared: all offspring were female. Eggs were removed from final instar nymphs, subimagos and virgin imagos of each generation and their development assessed. The life cycles of 487 individual C. dipterum and 315 C. simile were recorded, together with details of growth rate, egg production and adult size of these and other representatives of each generation. In order to distinguish between the effects of parthenogenesis and the effects of culture conditions, fertilized eggs of both species were reared under the same laboratory conditions. 2. Fewer unfertilized than fertilized eggs hatched. There was no consistent trend in the percentage hatch in successive parthenogenetic generations. In both species the time taken for parthenogenetic individuals to complete a generation varied considerably, and no relationship was found between generation length and the number of parthenogenetic generations that had passed, the developmental stage of the donor, or the time taken for the eggs to hatch. After 50 weeks there was, in both species, an overlap of up to six generations. The number of eggs produced by both species was significantly greater in the first parthenogenetic generation than in later generations but the numbers for later generations lie within the recorded range of egg number in imagos captured in the field. 3. To find if parthenogenetic individuals occur in the field, the sex ratios of last instar nymphs and subimagos of C. simile were measured in samples collected over 13 successive years from a set of small isolated pools. There was a female bias both in winter and at the start of the emergence season. It is possible that, when mature nymphs and emerging subimagos are damaged by predators, the eggs which are released from them survive and develop. 4. Mature, egg‐containing nymphs of both species were present in the field throughout the year, although their numbers were small at the beginning of winter. 5. Oviposition by imagos captured from mating swarms and by virgin imagos, of both species, was recorded for the first time, showing that C. dipterum is not always ovoviviparous. It is suggested that early instar nymphs occurring in mid‐winter come not only from unfertilized eggs released from injured nymphs and subimagos, but also from fertilized eggs laid in autumn.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.