H alf a decade into a new global economic crisis, most policymakers, pundits, and scholars discuss the situation in nongendered ways, carting out long-standing criticisms of bloated states or of neoliberalism, despite powerful feminist critiques. At the same time, feminist scholars, particularly those within feminist political science (FPS) studying advanced democracies, have been struggling with a "central paradox. .. . The widespread formal adoption and development of. .. gender equality. .. initiatives. .. [but] their partial and variable institutionalization in terms of impact on institutional practices, norms, and outcomes" Janet Elise Johnson is grateful for travel funds from PSC-CUNY and The Nation (see Johnson 2011) and for Hrö nn Sveinsdó ttir and others who introduced me to Iceland. An earlier version of this article was presented at the European Consortium for Political Research in August of 2011 in a panel on "male dominance" chaired by Drude Dahlerup. A special thanks to our reviewers who went beyond the call of duty.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.