BACKGROUNDTo better inform clinical practice, this study was aimed at capturing patients' motivations for enrolling in phase 1 trials and at quantifying their expectations of the benefits, risks, and commitment associated with clinical trials and the impact of the initial consultation on their expectations.METHODSThis was a single‐center, prospective, quantitative study of newly referred adult patients considering their first phase 1 oncology trial. Participants completed questionnaires before they were seen and an abbreviated follow‐up version after their consultation.RESULTSQuestionnaires were completed by 396 (99%) and 301 (76%) before and after the clinic, respectively. Participants ranked the possibility of tumor shrinkage (84%) as the most important motivation for considering a phase 1 trial; this was followed by no alternative treatments (56%), their physician's recommendation (44%), and the fact that the research might benefit others (38%). When they were asked about the potential personal benefit, 43% predicted tumor shrinkage initially. After the consultation, this increased to 47%. Fourteen percent of patients expected a cure. When asked about risks, 71% of the participants expected moderate side effects. When asked about expectations of time commitments, a majority of patients did not anticipate weekly visits, although this was understood by 93% of patients after the consultation. Overall, patients were keen to consider trials and when asked before and after the consultation 72% and 84% were willing to enroll in studies, respectively.CONCLUSIONSThis study reports that more than 80% of patients enroll in early‐phase clinical oncology trials motivated by the potential of a clinical benefit, with approximately half expecting tumor shrinkage and approximately a tenth anticipating a cure. The typical phase 1 response rate is 4% to 20%, and this discrepancy exemplifies the challenges faced by patients and healthcare professionals during their interactions for phase 1 studies. Cancer 2016;122:3501–3508. © 2016 American Cancer Society

The dose of ZD1694 recommended for phase II trials is 3.0 mg/m2.

Raltitrexed (Tomudex) is a specific inhibitor of thymidylate synthase and has recently been licensed in Europe for use in the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma. This study evaluated the metabolism, excretion and pharmacokinetics after a single dose of 3.0 mg/m2 [14C]-raltitrexed in patients with advanced solid malignancies not amenable to curative therapy. From April 1994 to July 1995, nine patients (six men and three women) were recruited into the study. Pharmacokinetics analysis was performed during the first cycle of treatment in all patients and, in two patients, limited sampling was done prior to and during the second cycle of treatment. The mean observed peak plasma concentration (Cmax) was 700.6 ng/ml and the median time (tmax) to reach maximal raltitrexed concentrations was 15 min after the initiation of the infusion. After reaching Cmax the drug declined in a triexponential manner with a terminal half-life of 257 h. The AUC0-infinity as predicted by the pharmacokinetic model was 2341.7 ng h ml(-1). Clearance was 41.3 ml/min, of which renal clearance accounted for 50-60%. Urinary collection for the measurement of radiolabeled drug revealed that renal excretion extrapolated to infinity accounted for 40% of the total radioactive dose. Faecal excretion accounted for only 3% of the dose when samples were collected to day 5 in the first six patients. Collection was extended to 10 days in the last three patients and faecal elimination accounted for 14% in these patients. Raltitrexed measurements prior to subsequent doses suggest that there was no accumulation of the drug with repeated administration. Low levels of radioactivity measured in the red cell pellets on days 15, 22 and 29 are likely to represent drug retained by newly forming red cells at the time of dosing. Examination of the urine revealed that the drug was excreted unchanged. The toxicities seen were in line with those encountered in previous studies. Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in three patients and grade 3 neutropenia occurred in two patients.