1. Voluntary activation of elbow flexor muscles can be optimal during brief maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs), although central fatigue, a progressive decline in the ability to drive the muscle maximally, develops during sustained or repeated efforts. We stimulated the motor cortex and motor point in human subjects to investigate motor output during fatigue. 2. The increment in force (relative to the voluntary force) produced by stimulation of the motor point of biceps brachii increased during sustained isometric MVCs of the elbow flexors. Motoneuronal output became suboptimal during the contraction, i.e. central fatigue developed and accounted for a small but significant loss of maximal voluntary force. During 3 min MVCs, voluntary activation of biceps fell to an average of 90.7% from an average of > 99%. 3. The increment in force (relative to the voluntary force) produced by magnetic cortical stimulation was initially small (1.0%) but also increased during sustained MVCs to 9.8% (with a 2 min MVC). Thus, cortical output was not optimal at the time of stimulation nor were sites distal to the motor cortex already acting maximally. 4. A sphygmomanometer cuff around the upper arm blocked blood supply to brachioradialis near the end of a sustained MVC and throughout subsequent brief MVCs. Neither maximal voluntary force nor voluntary activation recovered during ischaemia after the sustained MVC. However, fatigue‐induced changes in EMG responses to magnetic cortical stimulation recovered rapidly despite maintained ischaemia. 5. In conclusion, during sustained MVCs, voluntary activation becomes less than optimal so that force can be increased by stimulation of the motor cortex or the motor nerve. Complex changes in excitability of the motor cortex also occur with fatigue, but can be dissociated from the impairment of voluntary activation. We argue that inadequate neural drive effectively ‘upstream’ of the motor cortex must be one site involved in the genesis of central fatigue.

Recently, transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex (TMS) revealed impaired voluntary activation of muscles during maximal efforts. Hence, we evaluated its use as a measure of voluntary activation over a range of contraction strengths in both fresh and fatigued muscles, and compared it with standard twitch interpolation using nerve stimulation. Subjects contracted the elbow flexors isometrically while force and EMG from biceps and triceps were recorded. In one study, eight subjects made submaximal and maximal test contractions with rests to minimise fatigue. In the second study, eight subjects made sustained maximal contractions to reduce force to 60 % of the initial value, followed by brief test contractions. Force responses were recorded following TMS or electrical stimulation of the biceps motor nerve. In other contractions, EMG responses to TMS (motor evoked potentials, MEPs) or to stimulation at the brachial plexus (maximal M waves, Mmax) were recorded. During contractions of 50 % maximum, TMS elicited large MEPs in biceps (> 90 % Mmax) which decreased in size (to ≈70 % Mmax) with maximal efforts. This suggests that faster firing rates made some motor units effectively refractory. With fatigue, MEPs were also smaller but remained > 70 % Mmax for contractions of 50–100 % maximum. For fresh and fatigued muscle, the superimposed twitch evoked by motor nerve and motor cortex stimulation decreased with increasing contraction strength. For nerve stimulation the relation was curvilinear, and for TMS it was linear for contractions of 50‐100 % maximum (r2= 1.00). Voluntary activation was derived using the expression: (1 – superimposed twitch/resting twitch) × 100. The resting twitch was measured directly for nerve stimulation and for TMS, it was estimated by extrapolation of the linear regression between the twitch and voluntary force. For cortical stimulation, this resulted in a highly linear relation between voluntary activation and force. Furthermore, the estimated activation corresponded well with contraction strength. Using TMS or nerve stimulation, voluntary activation was high during maximal efforts of fresh muscle. With fatigue, both measures revealed reduced voluntary activation (i.e. central fatigue) during maximal efforts. Measured with TMS, this central fatigue accounted for one‐quarter of the fall in maximal voluntary force. We conclude that TMS can quantify voluntary activation for fresh or fatigued muscles at forces of 50–100 % maximum. Unlike standard twitch interpolation of the elbow flexors, voluntary activation measured with TMS varies in proportion to voluntary force, it reveals when extra output is available from the motor cortex to increase force, and it elicits force from all relevant synergist muscles.

Magnetic and electrical stimulation at different levels of the neuraxis show that supraspinal and spinal factors limit force production in maximal isometric efforts ("central fatigue"). In sustained maximal contractions, motoneurons become less responsive to synaptic input and descending drive becomes suboptimal. Exercise-induced activity in group III and IV muscle afferents acts supraspinally to limit motor cortical output but does not alter motor cortical responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation. "Central" and "peripheral" fatigue develop more slowly during submaximal exercise. In sustained submaximal contractions, central fatigue occurs in brief maximal efforts even with a weak ongoing contraction (<15% maximum). The presence of central fatigue when much of the available motor pathway is not engaged suggests that afferent inputs contribute to reduce voluntary activation. Small-diameter muscle afferents are likely to be activated by local activity even in sustained weak contractions. During such contractions, it is difficult to measure central fatigue, which is best demonstrated in maximal efforts. To show central fatigue in submaximal contractions, changes in motor unit firing and force output need to be characterized simultaneously. Increasing central drive recruits new motor units, but the way this occurs is likely to depend on properties of the motoneurons and the inputs they receive in the task. It is unclear whether such factors impair force production for a set level of descending drive and thus represent central fatigue. The best indication that central fatigue is important during submaximal tasks is the disproportionate increase in subjects' perceived effort when maintaining a low target force.

1. The excitability of the motor cortex was investigated during fatiguing contractions of the elbow flexors in human subjects. Although the silent period following cervicomedullary stimulation lengthened, it remained substantially shorter than the cortically evoked silent period. 5. The altered EMG responses to transcranial stimulation during fatigue suggest both increased excitation and increased inhibition in the motor cortex. As these changes were unaffected by manipulation of afferent input they presumably result from intrinsic cortical processes and/or altered voluntary drive to the motor cortex.Transcranial magnetic stimulation can be used to examine the motor output in human subjects. Stimulation over the motor cortex evokes both excitatory and inhibitory responses in the EMG of contracting muscle. The shortlatency motor-evoked potential (MEP) is a compound muscle action potential with an onset latency consistent with a rapidly conducting monosynaptic pathway. It is believed to arise from direct and trans-synaptic activation of corticospinal neurones and is influenced by the excitability of the motor cortex and the a-motoneurone pool (Amassian,