OBJECTIVE—To compare populations with and outcomes of diabetic foot ulcers managed in the U.K., Germany, Tanzania, and Pakistan and to explore the use of a new score of ulcer type in comparing outcomes among different countries. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Data from a series of 449 patients with diabetic foot ulcers managed in the U.K. were used to evaluate the new simplified system of classification and to derive an aggregate score. The use of the score was then explored using data from series managed in Germany (n = 239), Tanzania (n = 479), and Pakistan (n = 173). RESULTS—A highly significant difference was found in time to healing between ulcers of increasing score in the U.K. series (Kruskal-Wallis test; P = 0). When data from all centers were examined, a step-up in days to healing was noted for those with scores of ≥3 (out of 6). Examination of baseline variables contributing to outcome revealed the following differences among centers: ischemia, ulcer area, and depth contributing to outcome in the U.K.; ischemia, area, depth, and infection in Germany; depth, infection, and neuropathy in Tanzania; and depth alone in Pakistan. CONCLUSIONS—Any system of classification designed for general implementation must encompass all the variables that contribute to outcome in different communities. Adoption of a simple score based on these variables, the Site, Ischemia, Neuropathy, Bacterial Infection, and Depth (SINBAD) score, may prove useful in predicting ulcer outcome and enabling comparison among different centers.

Similarities in different regions of the world among people with diabetes suffering newly presenting foot lesions include a predominance of males and patients with Type 2 diabetes, as well as a high frequency of diabetic neuropathy. However, differences concerning age, diabetes duration, peripheral vascular disease, and precipitating factors contributing to injury are also observed.

Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is associated with premature mortality, generally thought to be exaggerated in patients with microalbuminuria. This prospective 8-year follow-up study aimed to determine outcome, mortality and cause of death in NIDDM patients with abnormal urinary albumin excretion compared to those with normal albumin excretion. We recruited 153 NIDDM patients with abnormal urinary albumin excretion and 153 control subjects with albumin excretion within the normal non-diabetic range, matched for age, sex and duration of diabetes, from three University hospital diabetic clinics in Newcastle upon Tyne. The outcome measures were status at follow-up, mortality and cause of death. Subjects with abnormal albumin excretion had a significantly higher 8-year mortality than matched control subjects (Odds Ratio 1.47, p = 0.02; 108 vs 66 per 1000 person years follow-up, p < 0.001). This difference was seen at all levels of abnormal albumin excretion, from just outside the normal range (10.6-29.9 microgram/min: 104 vs 61 per 1000 person years follow-up, p < 0.001) to more conventional definitions of microalbuminuria (> or = 30 micrograms/min: 111 vs 71 per 1000 person years follow-up, p < 0.01). Those with abnormal albumin excretion had an excess of vascular deaths compared to matched control subjects (Odds Ratio 1.70, p = 0.009), again at different levels of albumin excretion (10.6-29.9 micrograms/min p < 0.01, 30-150 micrograms/min p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, age, initial ischaemic heart disease and initial albumin excretion rates were independent predictors of death from all causes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Diabetic foot ulcers are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in Tanzania. Mortality rates among patients with severe ulcers remain high despite surgery. Thus, surgery undertaken during the less severe stages of ulcers may improve patient outcome. Education of patients should underscore the importance of foot care and consulting a doctor during the early stages of foot ulcer disease.

The strength of the statistical association between outcome and both neuropathy and infection contrasts with findings in series previously reported from the USA and UK, and highlights the differences which may be found in different populations. These differences have implications for any system of classification chosen to compare the effectiveness of management in different centres in different countries.