No abstract

No abstract

With the passage of P.L. 99-457 in October of 1986, the field of early intervention has been faced with the challenge of broadening its scope (Silber, 1989). This legislation expanded early intervention from a child-centered service to a service offered to families within a variety of contexts; from a service for children with special needs to a service available to families as soon as risks are identified. New programs are being designed and developed with an interagency focus which serve not only children with developmental disabilities but also their families in health, education and social services (Cornwell and Thurman, 1990). Current legislation suggests that services should be available to families as soon as their children are identified as being at-risk (Smith, 1987). In response to the legislation, states are developing definitions of "at-risk" based on criteria other than the child's test scores. Therefore, in many cases, early intervention services are being offered to families while their at-risk infants are still hospitalized and receiving intensive care. Evaluation of these innovative and complex service delivery programs is being addressed as these services are developed. With the broadening of the scope of early intervention comes the need to rethink the traditional methods of evaluating these programs. This paper will address some of the issues involved in evaluating family-centered programs which are based in neonatal intensive care units (NICU).

Networking is one way that rural families can access needed resources. The networking process developed by Project HAPPEN in Morganton, North Carolina enables families to meet their needs using resources within themselves and their communities. This article shares a description of this approach, along with tips for individuals who “network” on the job.

No abstract