This investigation describes the development and validation of a test battery for evaluating physical activity restrictions (PAR) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The tasks on the final version of the PAR include (a) a 6-min walk; (b) a stair climb; (c) a lifting and carrying task; and (d) getting into and out of a car. Data from patients with knee OA revealed that the four tasks loaded highly on a single unrotated principal component yielding an alpha internal consistency reliability of 0.92. These data suggest that investigators may choose to use an aggregate score and/or responses from individual tasks. Two week test-retest reliabilities for the four tasks were all in excess of 0.85 and there was support for their concurrent and convergent validity. Specifically, performance on the tasks correlated with time on treadmill, difficulty with self-reported ADLs, and ratings of difficulty following the performance of each task. Additional research is needed on the predictive validity of the measure and its sensitivity to change.

We conducted a randomized trial in a community rehabilitation hospital to determine the effect of treatment in a geriatric assessment unit on the physical function, institutionalization rate, and mortality of elderly patients. Functionally impaired elderly patients (mean age, 78.8 years) who were recovering from acute medical or surgical illnesses and were considered at risk for nursing home placement were randomly assigned either to the geriatric assessment unit (n = 78) or to a control group that received usual care (n = 77). The two groups were similar at entry and were stratified according to the perceived risk of an immediate nursing home placement. After six months, the patients treated in the geriatric assessment unit had significantly more functional improvement in three of eight basic self-care activities (P less than 0.05). Those in the lower-risk stratum had significantly more improvement in seven of eight self-care activities. Both six weeks and six months after randomization, significantly more patients treated in the geriatric assessment unit than controls (79 vs. 61 percent after six months) were residing in the community. During the year of follow-up, the control patients had more nursing home stays of six months or longer (10 vs. 3; P less than 0.05). However, there was no difference between the groups in the mean number of days spent in health care facilities (acute care hospital, nursing home, or rehabilitation hospital). Survival analysis showed a trend toward fewer deaths among the patients treated in the geriatric assessment unit, and mortality was significantly reduced in the patients considered to be at lower risk of immediate nursing home placement (P less than 0.05). We conclude that the treatment of selected elderly patients in a specialized geriatric rehabilitation unit improves function, decreases the risk of nursing home placement, and may reduce mortality. The beneficial effects on mortality and function appear greatest for patients at a moderate rather than high risk of nursing home placement.

BACKGROUND. Important clinical decisions often hinge on patients' functional status. Previous studies have shown disagreement among sources of ratings of patients' functional status. This study compared patient self-ratings, family member ratings, and physician ratings of patient function to performance-based functional testing criteria. METHODS. Five activities of daily living of 73 older patients were studied at admission to a rehabilitation unit following discharge from an acute care community hospital. Data were collected from patients, family members, and physicians and were compared with performance-based function testing. RESULTS. Patient ratings were significantly more accurate than physician ratings for walking, transferring, and telephoning. Patients were significantly more accurate than family members for rating walking and telephoning, but patients were not significantly more accurate than family members or physicians for rating eating or dressing. CONCLUSIONS. We conclude that decisions about patients' functional level should be based on performance testing. If performance testing is unavailable, patients' own ratings are most accurate, followed by family ratings. Physicians' ratings are least accurate.

We conducted a prospective study of 293 elderly patients undergoing cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation to determine the impact of the surgery on vision and on subjective and objective measures of patient function. Visual acuity in the surgical eye improved from a mean of 20/100 before surgery to 20/40 four months after surgery; improvement was maintained at one year. Positive changes occurred in some subjective measures of patient function, such as reported activities of daily living and patient report of vision-dependent activities, but these changes were modest. The most marked changes in patient function occurred in objective measures of function. Mental status had improved not quite significantly at four months but significantly at one year. Timed manual performance improved dramatically and significantly at four months and one year. Cataract surgery was associated with improved vision and improved objective function in most patients by four months after surgery, and these improvements were maintained at one year.

This study demonstrates that lovastatin was extremely well tolerated in an older cohort, both with regard to symptoms and to health-related quality of life.