Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess recovery time following photostress and its association with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) cross-sectionally and longitudinally in an elderly population-based cohort. Methods We analyzed photostress recovery time (PRT) and AMD in >1800 AugUR study participants aged 70+ years. On color fundus images from baseline and 3-year follow-up, presence of AMD was graded manually (Three Continent AMD Consortium Severity Scale). Visual acuity (VA) was assessed via Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts. After a 30-second bleaching of the macular region via direct ophthalmoscope, PRT was measured as the seconds to regain VA. Results First, we analyzed 1208 AugUR participants cross-sectionally (288 with early AMD, and 78 with late AMD). Prolonged PRT was associated with early and late AMD versus no AMD (median PRT = 119.5, 198.0 versus 80.0 seconds, respectively; logistic regression odds ratio [OR] = 1.109–1.165 per 10 seconds, P values < 0.0001). Sensitivity analyses using alternative models or restricting to participants after cataract surgery revealed similar ORs. Second, the association was confirmed in an independent cross-sectional AugUR sample ( n = 486). Third, in longitudinal analysis of 233 AugUR participants without AMD, prolonged PRT was associated with incident AMD ascertained 3 years later (follow-up time = 3.2 ± 0.2 years, OR = 1.112–1.162 per 10 seconds, P < 0.05). Overall, we demonstrate a significant association of prolonged PRT with AMD cross-sectionally and longitudinally in elderly individuals. Conclusions Prolonged PRT might capture retinal function impairment after cell damage before early AMD is visible via color fundus imaging. Translational Relevance Our results suggest PRT as quantitative predictive biomarker for incident AMD, making it potentially worthwhile also for clinical care.
The physiological stimulation of aldosterone production in adrenocortical glomerulosa cells by angiotensin II and high plasma K+ depends on the depolarization of the cell membrane potential and the subsequent Ca2+ influx via voltage-activated Ca2+ channels. Germline mutations of the low-voltage activated T-type Ca2+ channel CACNA1H (Cav3.2) have been found in patients with primary aldosteronism. Here, we investigated the electrophysiology and Ca2+ signaling of adrenal NCI-H295R cells overexpressing CACNA1H wildtype and mutant M1549V in order to understand how mutant CACNA1H alters adrenal cell function. Whole-cell patch-clamp measurements revealed a strong activation of mutant CACNA1H at the resting membrane potential of adrenal cells. Both the expression of wildtype and mutant CACNA1H led to a depolarized membrane potential. In addition, cells expressing mutant CACNA1H developed pronounced action potential-like membrane voltage oscillations. Ca2+ measurements showed an increased basal Ca2+ activity, an altered K+ sensitivity, and abnormal oscillating Ca2+ changes in cells with mutant CACNA1H. In addition, removal of extracellular Na+ reduced CACNA1H current, voltage oscillations, and Ca2+ levels in mutant cells, suggesting a role of the partial Na+ conductance of CACNA1H in cellular pathology. In conclusion, the pathogenesis of stimulus-independent aldosterone production in patients with CACNA1H mutations involves several factors: i) a loss of normal control of the membrane potential, ii) an increased Ca2+ influx at basal conditions, and iii) alterations in sensitivity to extracellular K+ and Na+. Finally, our findings underline the importance of CACNA1H in the control of aldosterone production and support the concept of the glomerulosa cell as an electrical oscillator.
Background Polygenic scores (PGSs) combining genetic variants found to be associated with creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcrea) have been applied in various study populations with different age ranges. This has shown that PGS explain less eGFRcrea variance in the elderly. Our aim was to understand how differences in eGFR variance and the percentage explained by PGS varies between population of general adults and elderly. Results We derived a PGS for cystatin-based eGFR (eGFRcys) from published genome-wide association studies. We used the 634 variants known for eGFRcrea and the 204 variants identified for eGFRcys to calculate the PGS in two comparable studies capturing a general adult and an elderly population, KORA S4 (n = 2,900; age 24–69 years) and AugUR (n = 2,272, age ≥ 70 years). To identify potential factors determining age-dependent differences on the PGS-explained variance, we evaluated the PGS variance, the eGFR variance, and the beta estimates of PGS association on eGFR. Specifically, we compared frequencies of eGFR-lowering alleles between general adult and elderly individuals and analyzed the influence of comorbidities and medication intake. The PGS for eGFRcrea explained almost twice as much (R2 = 9.6%) of age-/sex adjusted eGFR variance in the general adults compared to the elderly (4.6%). This difference was less pronounced for the PGS for eGFRcys (4.7% or 3.6%, respectively). The beta-estimate of the PGS on eGFRcrea was higher in the general adults compared to the elderly, but similar for the PGS on eGFRcys. The eGFR variance in the elderly was reduced by accounting for comorbidities and medication intake, but this did not explain the difference in R2-values. Allele frequencies between general adult and elderly individuals showed no significant differences except for one variant near APOE (rs429358). We found no enrichment of eGFR-protective alleles in the elderly compared to general adults. Conclusions We concluded that the difference in explained variance by PGS was due to the higher age- and sex-adjusted eGFR variance in the elderly and, for eGFRcrea, also by a lower PGS association beta-estimate. Our results provide little evidence for survival or selection bias.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.