Recent reviews on auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) advocate a qualitative and interdisciplinary research that not only is limited to single descriptive features, but also involves contextual issues and co-occurring psychopathology. In this study of mainly readmitted patients with the
International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision
, diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia and experiencing AVH, we performed a qualitative, phenomenologically oriented interview study. The focus was on the beginning of hallucinatory experiences, time to disclosure of the symptom, and the context surrounding the disclosure. We found that on average the patients experiencing AVH for 6.5 years before disclosing the symptom to a psychiatrist. Moreover, the term “voices” was typically appropriated by the patient during his contact with a psychiatric treatment facility. None of the patients considered themselves as being psychotic or severely mentally ill. The AVH in the majority of the patients was associated with other pathological subjective experiences. The significance of these findings is briefly discussed in relation to the concept of insight, diagnosis of psychosis, and early detection.
Hallucination is defined in the diagnostic systems as an experience resembling true perception without causal stimulus. In this second report from an in-depth phenomenological study of schizophrenia patients experiencing auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs), we focused on the phenomenological qualities of AVHs. We found that a substantial proportion of patients could not clearly distinguish between thinking and hallucinating. The emotional tone of the voices increased in negativity. AVHs became more complex. Spatial localization was ambiguous and only 10% experienced only external hallucinations. There was an overlap with passivity phenomena in one third of the cases. The patients occasionally acted upon the content of AVHs. In the discussion section, we criticize the perceptual model of AVHs. We conclude that the definition of AVH in schizophrenia is misleading and exerts negative consequences on the clinical work and empirical research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.