Piezosurgery use has become increasingly prevalent in osteotomies. Piezoelectric ultrasound waves can cut bone effectively, and some studies have shown reduced post-operative morbidities compared to conventional osteotomies. Oedema and ecchymosis are common complications of rhinoplasty and can impact patient satisfaction, wound healing, and recovery. We aim to provide an up-to-date comparison of post-operative oedema and ecchymosis in piezosurgery and conventional osteotomies. A literature search was conducted using the following online libraries; Pubmed, Cochrane, Science Direct, and ISRCTN (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number). English publications between 2015 and 2020 were included. A systematic review was completed, and a comparison of oedema and ecchymosis in piezosurgery and conventional osteotomies was examined alongside other outcomes such as pain, mucosal injury, and surgery time. Eight randomised controlled trials (RCTs) met our criteria with a combined total of 440 patients: 191 male and 249 female. Piezosurgery had statistically significant (p < 0.05) reduction in short-term oedema compared to conventional osteotomies in 75% of the papers included, and in 50% this persisted across the whole follow-up period. Similarly, ecchymosis scoring was initially statistically lower (p < 0.05) in piezosurgery in 87.5% of the RCTs, and in 75% this persisted across the whole follow-up period. A reduction in pain (p < 0.05) and mucosal injury (p < 0.05) was also seen in piezoelectric osteotomies. The length of surgery time varied. Piezoelectric osteotomies reduce oedema and ecchymosis compared to conventional osteotomies, in addition to improving pain and mucosal injury. However, disadvantages such as length of surgery time and cost have been reported. Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266.

Background: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a neuromuscular disorder characterised by progressive muscle wasting impacting mobility, ventilation and cardiac function. Associated neuromuscular cardiomyopathy remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. We investigated the effects of cardioprotective medications [angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), beta-blockers] on clinical outcomes in DMD patients.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study (reference: 2021/12469) of DMD patients at a tertiary centre between 1993-2021 screening the electronic records for demographics, comorbidities, medication, disease specific features, echocardiography, hospitalisations, and ventilator use.Results: A total of 68 patients were identified aged 27.4 (6.6) years, of which 52 were still alive. There was a difference in body mass index (BMI) between survivors and deceased patients [23.8 (5.9) vs.19.9 (3.8) kg/m 2 , P=0.03]. Home mechanical ventilation (HMV) was required in 90% of patients, 85% had DMD associated cardiomyopathy. About 2/3 of all hospitalisations during the observation period were secondary to cardiopulmonary causes. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at initial presentation was 44.8% (10.6%) and declined by 3.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4% to −7.0%] over the follow up period (P=0.002). A total of 61 patients were established on ACE-I for 75.9% (35.1%), and 62 were on betablockers for 73.6% (33.5%) of the follow up period. There was a significant LVEF decline in those taking ACE-I for limited periods compared to those permanently on ACE-I (P=0.002); a similar effect was recorded with beta-blockers (P=0.02).Conclusions: Long-term use of ACE-I and beta-blockers is associated with a reduced decline in LVEF in patients with DMD and may be protective of adverse cardiovascular ill health.

No abstract

No abstract