The catalytic effect of minerals on biomass conversion was studied focusing on Fe as well as alkali and alkaline earth metals as the metallic inorganic elements typically present in minerals found in biomass. A mineral-free reference hydrochar and an analogous char material based on cellulose were systematically doped with sulfates of the different metallic inorganic elements in various amounts via impregnation, thereby excluding differences originating from the counterion and the carbon matrix. Thermogravimetric reactivity measurements were performed in diluted O 2 and CO 2 , and the derivative thermogravimetry curves were fitted using the random pore model. This procedure enabled a quantification of the apparent activation energy decrease due to doping as well as the influence of doping on the carbon structural parameter. Fe sulfate was always among the most active minerals, and alkali metal sulfates were typically more active than alkaline earth metal sulfates. The only exception was the high activity of very small Ca sulfate loadings during gasification. A saturation behavior of the kinetic parameter upon increasing the mineral loading was observed. The Langmuirtype modeling of this dependence further revealed that catalytically influenced devolatilization results in a char with higher oxidation reactivity, whereas for gasification, thermal annealing dominates. The systematically derived parameters provide a comprehensive description of catalytic effects, taking into account the type of mineral, the applied loading, the used atmosphere, and the fuel morphology. The derived activation energies can be used to include catalytic effects into combustion models.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.