Background: The following registry (Katowice-Zabrze retrospective registry) aimed to assess the influence of a chronic kidney disease (CKD) on long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using either first-generation (DES-I) or second-generation (DES-II) drug-eluting stents. Methods: The study group consisted of 1,908 consecutive patients, of whom 331 (17.3%) had CKD. CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min/m². We evaluated the major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE), i.e., the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and target vessel revascularization at the 12-month follow-up. Results: CKD patients had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction and more often a history of MI and PCI. Coronary angiography revealed that multivessel coronary artery disease, intracoronary thrombus, and extensive calcifications were more frequent in patients with CKD. However, the SYNTAX score did not vary between patients with or without CKD. There was a higher rate of in-hospital bleedings requiring blood transfusion in patients with CKD. At the 1-year follow-up, MACCE (17.8 vs. 12.6%, HR = 1.46 [95% CI 1.05-2.03], p = 0.009) and death (8.4 vs. 2.3%, HR = 3.9 [95% CI 2.0-7.5], p < 0.001) were more often observed in CKD patients. Multivariable Cox analysis revealed that CKD was an independent risk predictor of death after PCI at the 1-year follow-up (HR = 2.1 [95% CI 1.2-3.6], p = 0.004). In comparison to DES-I, the use of DES-II did not decrease the adverse effect of CKD on MACCE. Conclusion: CKD patients had an increased risk of in-hospital bleeding requiring blood transfusion and a higher risk of MACCE and death at the 12-month follow-up. The use of second-generation DES did not improve clinical outcomes in patients with CKD at the 12-month follow-up.

A b s t r a c tBackground: Coexisting anaemia is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Aim:To assess the impact of anaemia in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) treated with first-and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) on one-year MACCE. Methods and results:The registry included 1916 consecutive patients (UA: n = 1502, 78.3%; NSTEMI: n = 283, 14.7%; STEMI/LBBB: n = 131, 6.8%) treated either with first-(34%) or second-generation (66%) DES. The study population was divided into two groups: patients presenting with anaemia 217 (11%) and without anaemia 1699 (89%) prior to PCI. Anaemia was defined according to World Heart Organisation (haemoglobin [Hb] level < 13 g/dL for men and < 12 g/dL for women). Patients with anaemia were older (69, IQR: 61-75 vs. 62, IQR: 56-70, p < 0.001), had higher prevalence of co-morbidities: diabetes (44.7% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.020), chronic kidney disease (31.3% vs. 19.4%; p < 0.001), peripheral artery disease (10.1% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.005), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction values (50, IQR: 40-57% vs. 55, IQR: 45-60%; p < 0.001). No difference between gender in frequency of anaemia was found. Patients with anaemia more often had prior myocardial infarction (MI) (57.6% vs. 46.4%; p = 0.002) and coronary artery bypass grafting (31.3% vs. 19.4%; p < 0.001) in comparison to patients without anaemia. They also more often had multivessel disease in angiography (36.4% vs. 26.1%; p = 0.001) and more complexity CAD as measured by SYNTAX score (21, IQR: 12-27 points vs. 14, IQR: 8-22 points; p = 0.001). In-hospital risk of acute heart failure (2.7% vs. 0.7%; p = 0.006) and bleeding requiring transfusion (3.2% vs. 0.5%; p < 0.001) was significantly higher in patients with anaemia. One-year follow-up showed that there was higher rate of death in patients with anaemia. However, there were no differences in MI, stroke, target vessel revascularisation (TVR) and MACCE in comparison to patients with normal Hb. There were no differences according to type of DES (first vs. second generation) in the population of patients with anaemia. Conclusions:In patients with anaemia there is a significantly higher risk of death in 12-month follow-up, but anaemia has no impact on the incidence of MI, repeat revascularisation, stroke and MACCE. There is no advantage of II-DES over I-DES generation in terms of MACCE and TVR in patients with anaemia. 562INTRODUCTION Coronary artery disease (CAD) continues to be the most common cause of death in middle-aged and elderly individuals in developed countries. In addition to the well-known risk factors such as age, male-gender, smoking, dyslipidaemia, and impaired glucose tolerance, haematological disorders seem also to play an important role in the progression of CAD. Anaemia is the one of the most common haematological abnormalities observed in patients with CAD, occurri...

BackgroundThis study compared safety and efficacy of first- and second-generation DES in an unrestricted, real-life population of diabetic patients undergoing PCI.Material/MethodsThe study was a subanalysis of diabetic patients from the all-comer Katowice-Zabrze Registry of patients undergoing PCI with the implantation of either first- (Paclitaxel-, Sirolimus-eluting stents) or second-generation DES (Zotarolimus-, Everolimus-, Biolimus-eluting stents). Efficacy defined as major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, stroke) and safety defined as stent thrombosis (ST) were evaluated at 1 year.ResultsFrom the total of 1916 patients, 717 were diabetics. Among them, 257 (36%) were treated with first-generation DES (230 [89%] Paclitaxel-eluting stents, 27 [11%] Sirolimus-eluting stents), 460 with second-generation DES (171 [37%] Zotarolimus-eluting stents, 243 [53%] Everolimus-eluting stents, 46 [10%] Biolimus-eluting stents). Rate of MACCE was equal in both groups (p=0.54). Second-generation DES had a better safety profile than first-generation DES (log-rank for cumulative ST at 1 year p<0.001). First-generation DES was a risk factor for ST (HR 5.75 [1.16–28.47], p=0.03) but not for MACCE (HR 0.89 [0.6–1.32], p=0.57).ConclusionsIn a real-life setting of diabetic patients undergoing PCI, second-generation DES had lower risk of ST and similar MACCE rate compared to first-generation DES.

BackgroundThere are sparse data on the performance of different types of drug-eluting stents (DES) in acute and real-life setting.ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to compare the safety and efficacy of first- versus second-generation DES in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).MethodsThis all-comer registry enrolled consecutive patients diagnosed with ACS and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention with the implantation of first- or second-generation DES in one-year follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoint was defined as major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization and stroke. The primary safety outcome was definite stent thrombosis (ST) at one year.ResultsFrom the total of 1916 patients enrolled into the registry, 1328 patients were diagnosed with ACS. Of them, 426 were treated with first- and 902 with second-generation DES. There was no significant difference in the incidence of MACCE between two types of DES at one year. The rate of acute and subacute ST was higher in first- vs. second-generation DES (1.6% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001, and 1.2% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.025, respectively), but there was no difference regarding late ST (0.7% vs. 0.2%, respectively, p = 0.18) and gastrointestinal bleeding (2.1% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.21). In Cox regression, first-generation DES was an independent predictor for cumulative ST (HR 3.29 [1.30-8.31], p = 0.01).Conclusions In an all-comer registry of ACS, the one-year rate of MACCE was comparable in groups treated with first- and second-generation DES. The use of first-generation DES was associated with higher rates of acute and subacute ST and was an independent predictor of cumulative ST.

Long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) depends on vessel diameter; however, there is insufficient evidence on particular drug-eluting stent (DES) types in this setting. The aim of the study was to assess long-term performance of PCI depending on stented vessel size and DES generations. This observational study from a prospective Registry of PCI with DES assessed safety (stent thrombosis) and efficacy (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE)) of the implantation of first- (DES1) or second-generation DESs (DES2) in small and large vessels. Of 699 patients included in the analysis, 337 (48%) patients underwent PCI in small vessels. PCI in small vessels, especially the left anterior descending artery (LAD) (hazard ratio (HR) 2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5–4.5), was associated with a higher rate of MACCEs than that in large vessels (20% vs. 14%, p = 0.025) with no difference in the rate of stent thrombosis (ST). No significant difference in safety and efficacy was found between DES1 and DES2 in small vessels. For large vessels, a higher incidence of MACCEs (21% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.002) driven by a higher rate of re-PCI (15% vs. 6%, p = 0.006) and a higher rate of cumulative stent thrombosis (3.5% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.04) was shown for DES1 than DES2. In multivariate analysis, DES1 was a significant risk factor for MACCEs in large, but not in small vessels. The risk of PCI in small vessels, especially LAD, remains high independent of the type of DES. In contrast, DES2 as a modifiable variable during PCI of a large lesion might improve long-term prognosis.