Groundwater in Africa supports livelihoods and poverty alleviation 1,2 , maintains vital ecosystems, and strongly influences terrestrial water and energy budgets 3. However, hydrologic processes governing groundwater recharge sustaining this resource, and their sensitivity to climatic variability, are poorly constrained 4,5. Here we show, through analysis of multi-decadal groundwater hydrographs across sub-Saharan Africa, how aridity controls the predominant recharge processes whereas local hydrogeology influences the type and sensitivity of precipitation-recharge relationships. Some humid locations show approximately linear precipitation-recharge relationships with small rainfall intensity exceedance thresholds governing recharge; others show surprisingly small variation in recharge across a wide range of annual precipitation. As aridity increases, precipitation thresholds governing initiation of recharge increase, recharge becomes more episodic, and focussed recharge via losses from ephemeral overland flows becomes increasingly dominant. Extreme annual recharge is commonly associated with intense rainfall and flooding events, themselves often driven by largescale climate controls. Intense precipitation, even during lower precipitation years, produces substantial recharge in some dry subtropical locations, challenging the 'high certainty' consensus that drying climatic trends will decrease water resources in such regions 4. The likely resilience of groundwater in many areas revealed by improved understanding of precipitation-recharge

The threat of climate change is emerging at a time of rapid growth for many economies in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Dominant narratives comprising ambitious development plans are common and often based around sectors with strong inter-dependencies that are highly exposed to climate variability. Using document analysis and key informant interviews, this article examines how climate change is addressed in policy, how it is being mainstreamed into water, energy and agriculture sector policies and the extent to which cross-sectoral linkages enable coordinated action. These questions are addressed through a case study of Tanzania, highlighting broader lessons for other developing countries, particularly those in SSA facing similar challenges. The article finds that, while the agriculture and water sectors are increasingly integrating climate change into policies and plans in Tanzania, practical coordination on adaptation remains relatively superficial. Publication of the Tanzania National Adaptation Plan of Action (NAPA) in 2007 marked a step change in the integration of climate change in sectoral policies and plans; however, it may have reinforced a sectoral approach to climate change. Examining the policies for coherence highlights overlaps and complementarities which lend themselves to a coordinated approach. Institutional constraints (particularly structures and resources) restrict opportunities for inter-sectoral action and thus collaboration is confined to ad hoc projects with mixed success to date. The results highlight the need for institutional frameworks that recognize and address these constraints to enable development goals to be pursued in a more sustainable and climate-resilient manner. KEY POLICY INSIGHTS. The NAPA has been successful at encouraging climate change mainstreaming into sectoral policies in Tanzania; however, the cross-sectoral collaboration crucial to implementing adaptation strategies remains limited due to institutional challenges such as power imbalances, budget constraints and an ingrained sectoral approach. . Collaboration between nexus sectors in Tanzania is largely through ad hoc projects with limited progress on establishing deeper connections to enable collaboration as a process. Regular cross-sectoral planning meetings and consistent annual budgets could provide a platform to enhance cross-sectoral coordination. . Plans to develop hydropower and agriculture are prevalent across sub-Saharan Africa. Insights from Tanzania highlight the importance of institutional and policy frameworks that enable cross-sectoral coordination.ARTICLE HISTORY

Irrigation is a key strategy for food security and poverty alleviation among small farmers in Tanzania. However, the potential of irrigation to improve food security is limited by multiple barriers. This article discusses these barriers within the Kiwere and Magozi schemes. Results indicate that water supply barriers are caused by poor irrigation infrastructure and management. Lack of finance is also a critical barrier to increasing overall productivity. Finance affects farmers' timely access to adequate supply of quality inputs and machinery and availability of transport to access inputs and profitable markets. There is evidence that these barriers have to be addressed holistically.

No abstract

No abstract