The psychostimulants D-amphetamine (AMPH) and methamphetamine (METH) release excess dopamine (DA) into the synaptic clefts of dopaminergic neurons. Abnormal DA release is thought to occur by reverse transport through the DA transporter (DAT), and it is believed to underlie the severe behavioral effects of these drugs. Here we compare structurally similar AMPH and METH on DAT function in a heterologous expression system and in an animal model. In the in vitro expression system, DAT-mediated whole-cell currents were greater for METH stimulation than for AMPH. The dopamine transporter (DAT)3 is a main target for psychostimulants, such as D-amphetamine (AMPH), methamphetamine (METH), cocaine (COC), and methylphenidate (Ritalin). DAT is the major clearance mechanism for synaptic dopamine (DA) (1) and thereby regulates the strength and duration of dopaminergic signaling. AMPH and METH are substrates for DAT and competitively inhibit DA uptake (2, 3) and release DA through reverse transport (4 -9). AMPH-and METH-induced elevations in extracellular DA result in complex neurochemical changes and profound psychiatric effects (2, 10 -16). Despite their structural and pharmacokinetic similarities, a recent National Institute on Drug Abuse report describes METH as a more potent stimulant than AMPH with longer lasting effects at comparable doses (17). Although the route of METH administration and its availability must contribute to the almost four times higher lifetime nonmedical use of METH compared with AMPH (18), there may also be differences in the mechanisms that underlie the actions of these two drugs on the dopamine transporter.Recent studies by Joyce et al. (19) have shown that compared with D-AMPH alone, the combination of D-and L-AMPH in Adderall significantly prolonged the time course of extracellular DA in vivo. These experiments demonstrate that subtle structural features of AMPH, such as chirality, can affect its action on dopamine transporters. Here we investigate whether METH, a more lipophilic analog of AMPH, affects DAT differently than AMPH, particularly in regard to stimulated DA efflux.METH and AMPH have been reported as equally effective in increasing extracellular DA levels in rodent dorsal striatum (dSTR), nucleus accumbens (NAc) (10,14,20), striatal synaptosomes, and DAT-expressing cells in vitro (3, 6). John and

Background: Dopamine transporter (DAT) and ␣-synuclein interact, but the mode and mechanism of ␣-synuclein regulation of DAT activity are less known. Results: Elevated intracellular ␣-synuclein alters DAT-mediated currents and activity that are abrogated by DAT blocker and are absent with heat-inactivated ␣-synuclein. Conclusion: DAT/␣-synuclein interaction at the cell surface alters the ionic coupling of DAT. Significance: This interaction modulates dopamine transmission and thus neuronal function.

Methamphetamine (METH) is an addictive psychostimulant whose societal impact is on the rise. Emerging evidence suggests that psychostimulants alter synaptic plasticity in the brain—which may partly account for their adverse effects. While it is known that METH increases the extracellular concentration of monoamines dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine, it is not clear how METH alters glutamatergic transmission. Within this context, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of acute and systemic METH on basal synaptic transmission and long-term potentiation (LTP; an activity-induced increase in synaptic efficacy) in CA1 sub-field in the hippocampus. Both the acute ex vivo application of METH to hippocampal slices and systemic administration of METH decreased LTP. Interestingly, the acute ex vivo application of METH at a concentration of 30 or 60 µM increased baseline synaptic transmission as well as decreased LTP. Pretreatment with eticlopride (D2-like receptor antagonist) did not alter the effects of METH on synaptic transmission or LTP. In contrast, pretreatment with D1/D5 dopamine receptor antagonist SCH23390 or 5-HT1A receptor antagonist NAN-190 abrogated the effect of METH on synaptic transmission. Furthermore, METH did not increase baseline synaptic transmission in D1 dopamine receptor haploinsufficient mice. Our findings suggest that METH affects excitatory synaptic transmission via activation of dopamine and serotonin receptor systems in the hippocampus. This modulation may contribute to synaptic maladaption induced by METH addiction and/or METH-mediated cognitive dysfunction.

No abstract