Outpatient total joint arthroplasty is becoming a more attractive option for hospitals, surgeons, and patients. In this study, the authors evaluated the safety of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty by comparing an outpatient cohort with an inpatient cohort. Ninety-day outcomes of consecutively performed elective shoulder arthroplasty cases from 2012 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were preoperatively assigned to outpatient or inpatient care. Primary outcomes were emergency department visits, readmissions, mortality, and surgical morbidity within 90 days of surgery. Two-tailed t tests were used to evaluate differences. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to determine if the odds of emergency department visit, readmission, or complications were significantly different between the cohorts. There were 118 outpatient and 64 inpatient shoulder arthroplasty procedures. Mean age and American Society of Anesthesiologists score were lower in the outpatient group compared with the inpatient group-68.1 vs 72.4 years (P=.01) and 2.3 vs 2.6 (P<.01), respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression model including all arthroplasty cases, the odds of outpatient to inpatient readmission was significantly different (odds ratio, 0.181; P=.027). However, when only total shoulder arthroplasty cases were included, no difference was detected. No statistically significant difference was noted for number of emergency department visits, mortality, or surgical morbidity within 90 days of surgery in any of the models. There was 1 death in the ambulatory group at 28 days after surgery. On the basis of these findings, the authors believe that, for carefully selected patients, an outpatient shoulder arthroplasty protocol is safe when compared with inpatient protocols. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(4):e563-e568.].

IL-6 analysis may have utility as a confirmatory test but is not an effective screening tool for periprosthetic shoulder infection. This finding is in contrast to the observation, in previous studies, that IL-6 is more sensitive than traditional serum markers for periprosthetic infection.

Latissimus dorsi transfer is a well-established method for the treatment of posterosuperior massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. We propose using an arthroscopically assisted technique that avoids insult to the deltoid. With the patient in the lateral decubitus position, an L-shaped incision is made along the anterior belly of the latissimus muscle and then along the posterior axillary line. The latissimus and teres major are identified and separated. The tendon insertion of the latissimus is isolated, and a FiberWire traction suture (Arthrex, Naples, FL) is placed, facilitating dissection of the muscle to the thoracodorsal neurovascular pedicle and subsequent mobilization. The interval deep to the deltoid and superficial to the teres minor is developed into a subdeltoid tunnel for arthroscopic tendon transfer. The latissimus tendon is then transferred and stabilized arthroscopically to the lateral aspect of the infraspinatus and supraspinatus footprints by multiple suture anchors.

The most common orthopedic injuries in professional surfers involve the knee, ankle, shoulder, hip, and back. Surfers' rear extremities were preferentially injured which is the extremity responsible for power and torque. Shoulder injuries increased the probability of an operative intervention. Last, overuse injuries (femoral-acetabular impingement, rotator cuffs) occurred in the older surf population compared with more acute injuries (ankle sprains/fractures, anterior cruciate ligament tears) which is also consistent with time to surgery.