Soil thermal conductivity is an important factor in the design of energy foundations and other ground heat exchanger systems. It can be determined by a field thermal response test, which is both costly and time consuming, but tests a large volume of soil. Alternatively, cheaper and quicker laboratory test methods may be applied to smaller soil samples. This paper investigates two different laboratory methods: the steady state thermal cell and the transient needle probe. U100 soil samples were taken during the site investigation for a small diameter test pile, for which a thermal response test was later conducted. The thermal conductivities of the samples were measured using the two laboratory methods. The results from the thermal cell and needle probe were significantly different, with the thermal cell consistently giving higher values for thermal conductivity. The main difficulty with the thermal cell was determining the rate of heat flow, as the apparatus experiences significant heat losses. The needle probe was found to have fewer significant sources of error, but tests a smaller soil sample than the thermal cell. However, both laboratory methods gave much lower values of thermal conductivity compared to the in situ thermal response test. Possible reasons for these discrepancies are discussed, including sample size, orientation and disturbance.

Energy geostructures are structure or infrastructure foundations used as heat exchangers as part of a ground source heat pump system. While piles remain the most common type of energy geostructure, increasingly infrastructure projects are considering the use of other buried structures such as retaining walls and tunnels for heat exchange. To design and plan for construction of such systems, site investigations must provide appropriate information to derive analysis input parameters. This paper presents a review of what information regarding the ground, and also the structures themselves, would be required for the ground energy system design process. Appropriate site investigation methods for energy gesotructures are reviewed, from desk study stages through in situ testing to laboratory testing of samples recovered. Available methods are described and critically appraised and guidance for practical application is given.

Soil thermal conductivity is an important factor in the design of energy foundations and other ground heat exchanger systems. Laboratory tests in a thermal cell are often used to determine the thermal conductivity of soil specimens. Two interpretation methods have been suggested. Analysis can be based on the assumption of one-directional heat flow and the thermal conductivity calculated using Fourier's law. Alternatively the lumped capacitance method can be employed, using results generated as a specimen cools. In this study, six samples of London Clay were tested using a thermal cell. A finite-element model of the tests was then used to determine the validity of the assumptions made in analysis. The model showed substantial heat loss through the sides of the specimens, which would have a significant impact on the calculated thermal conductivity. The conditions required for the lumped capacitance method to be valid were also found not to be met. Consequently neither analysis method is recommended. A better approach would be to pursue apparatus with fewer heat losses or transient testing techniques.