No abstract

Background People who inject drugs (PWID) are at an increased risk for HIV infection due to injection and sexual risk behaviors. This study aims to examine PrEP knowledge, awareness, and willingness to be linked to PrEP services at a syringe services program (SSP), and examine the relationship between substance use and interest in PrEP linkage. Methods Data were collected using a cross-sectional survey of IDEA SSP clients in Miami, FL (N = 157). Based on reported substance injected, participants were classified into opioid-only injection or polysubstance injection. Socio-demographics and HIV risk were examined using Pearson's Chi-Squared analysis. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to test for significant correlates of interest in PrEP linkage. Results Only 28.3% of PWID surveyed had previously heard of PrEP. However, 57.2% were interested in receiving more information about PrEP. In the adjusted model, people with opioidonly use were significantly less likely to report interest in being linked to PrEP. Conclusion Knowledge, awareness, and interest in being linked to PrEP were low among PWID surveyed. No participants of the study were successfully linked to PrEP services through direct referrals. Further research is needed to examine low threshold service delivery of PrEP to PWID at SSPs.

Introduction The overdose crisis remains a critical public health problem, creating an urgent need to train physicians in the treatment and management of opioid use disorder (OUD). Our medicine clerkship module aimed to close this gap by training and assessing students’ motivational interviewing skills, harm reduction knowledge, and use of nonstigmatizing language in the treatment of patients with OUD. Methods We evaluated the impact of a small-group, case-based activity and patient panel on the clinical documentation skills of students in a medicine clerkship. Clinical documentation was based on an observed structured clinical examination of a standardized patient with OUD and was evaluated using a grading rubric that followed the module learning objectives. Students also submitted reflections on the curriculum. Results Qualitative responses ( n = 40) from students evaluating the small-group activity and patient panel exercise revealed overall student satisfaction with the patient panel and exposure to patients living with OUD. Three themes emerged from student reflections: (1) humanity, (2) different paths to recovery, and (3) using nonstigmatizing language. For the quantitative test, students’ ( n = 39) mean clinical documentation scores before and after the small-group activity and patient panel increased from 10.1 to 11.3 out of 13.5 possible points. There was a significant difference between mean pretest and posttest scores ( p < .001). Discussion The medicine clerkship provided an acceptable and feasible opportunity for implementing a multifaceted educational experience for students with significant immediate impact on their evaluation of patients with OUD.

OBJECTIVES Based on increasing drug overdose deaths and a shortage of healthcare professionals trained in the management of opioid use disorder (OUD), it is imperative to improve health professional education in addiction medicine. This small group learning exercise and patient panel was designed to provide first year medical students with insights into the lives of people with OUD—through a lens of harm reduction—and to connect biomedical knowledge to the core values and professional themes of their doctoring courses. METHODS Facilitators were assigned to each small group of 8 students for the harm reduction-centered Long and Winding Road small group case exercise. This was followed by a patient panel of 2 to 3 persons with OUD. The small group was conducted with first-year medical students as a virtual training session due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Students completed pre- and post-session surveys about agreement with statements pertaining to the learning objectives. RESULTS The small group and patient panel were delivered over 8 sessions and attended by all first-year medical students (N = 201). Survey response rate was 67%. Post-session, there was significantly greater agreement with knowledge on all learning objectives compared to pre-session. Two relevant multiple-choice questions on the medical student final exam were answered correctly by 79% and 98% of students. CONCLUSION Centering on people with lived experience, we completed small groups and patient panels to introduce concepts of OUD and harm reduction to first year medical students. Pre- and post-session surveys showed short-term achievement of the learning objectives.

No abstract