Solar radiation management (SRM) has been proposed as a means to reduce global warming in spite of high greenhouse-gas concentrations and to lower the chance of warming-induced tipping points. However, SRM may cause economic damages and its feasibility is still uncertain. To investigate the trade-off between these (economic) gains and damages, we incorporate SRM into a stochastic dynamic integrated assessment model and perform the first rigorous cost-benefit analysis of sulfate-based SRM under uncertainty, treating warming-induced climate tipping and SRM failure as stochastic elements. We find that within our model, SRM has the potential to greatly enhance future welfare and merits being taken seriously as a policy option. However, if only SRM and no CO 2 abatement is used, global warming is not stabilised and will exceed 2 K. Therefore, even if successful, SRM can not replace but only complement CO 2 abatement. The optimal policy combines CO 2 abatement and modest SRM and succeeds in keeping global warming below 2 K.
Abstract. Solar Radiation Management (SRM) has been proposed as a means to reduce global warming in spite of high greenhouse gas concentrations and lower the chance of warming-induced tipping points. However, SRM may cause economic damages, and its feasibility is still uncertain. To investigate the trade-off between these gains and damages, we incorporate SRM into a stochastic-dynamic integrated assessment model and perform the first rigorous cost-benefit analysis of sulphate-based SRM under uncertainty, treating warming-induced climate tipping and SRM failure as stochastic elements. We find that SRM has the potential to greatly enhance future welfare and should therefore be taken seriously as a policy option. However, if only SRM and no CO2 abatement is used, global warming is not stabilised and will exceed 2 K. Therefore, even if successful, SRM cannot replace but only complement CO2 abatement. The optimal policy combines CO2 abatement and modest SRM and succeeds in keeping global warming below 2 K.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.