Purpose of review To evaluate the impact of cochlear implantation on hearing outcomes, quality of life, complications, and cognitive function in elderly patients. Recent findings Nine articles published between 2014 and 2019 pertain to cochlear implantation in the elderly population. The findings conclude that cochlear implantation improves autonomy and overall quality of life in the elderly. Summary Design: a pubmed search was employed with title search terms ‘cochlear implant,’ AND ‘elderly’ or ‘aged.’ Twenty-one articles were generated. Of the 21, articles without evidence-based findings were excluded and those published more than 5 years ago were excluded, yielding a final number of nine articles for review. Results: nine articles published on the use of cochlear implantation in the elderly were identified through the literature search between the years 2014–2019. Outcomes included quality of life, speech recognition improvement, improvement in cognitive function as defined by geriatric validated scales, outcomes of hearing rehabilitation, improvement in verbal comprehension, surgical complications, and the ability to manage the external components of the device. Conclusion: cochlear implantation improves autonomy and the quality of life in the elderly. Age should not be a factor limiting surgical decision-making, and cochlear implantation can be utilized as a well tolerated, efficient treatment option for severe-to-profound hearing loss in the elderly population.
Objective: Stapedectomy remains a key indicator case reportable to the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education despite the decline in the incidence of otosclerosis over the last half century. This study compared the rates of stapedectomy performed by otolaryngologists at academic and nonacademic centers. Study Design: Retrospective review. Setting: Tertiary referral academic centers, nonacademic centers, and civilian purchased-care across the Department of Defense between 2015 and 2020. Patients: Department of Defense beneficiaries with otosclerosis near a military treatment facility with an otolaryngologist. Interventions: Stapedectomy (Current Procedural Terminology codes 69,660, 69,661, and 69,662). Main Outcome Measures: Number of stapedectomies performed by setting.Results: From 2015 to 2020, 426 stapedectomies were performed at or near a military treatment facility with an otolaryngologist (274 directly by military otolaryngologists, 152 by community providers). Military providers performed 94% of stapedectomies at or near military academic centers, versus only 30% at or near nonacademic centers ( p < 0.0001). Among the 60 stapedectomies performed at nonacademic centers, only 30 were performed by general otolaryngologists (7% of all stapedectomies performed; 11% of procedures by military providers) while the rest were performed by fellowship-trained otologist or neurotologist. Conclusions: Low stapes surgical volume by military general otolaryngologists reinforces recent epidemiologic trends and suggests that few general otolaryngologists graduate residency with sufficient competency to pursue independently performing stapedectomy or have difficulty maintaining competency after graduation.
Hypothesis: Round window velocity measurements should correlate closely with vibration measurements taken at proximal points along an intact chain over a set frequency range. These round window vibration measurements should be similar to the vibration measurements taken of the ossicles if mechanical energy is conserved through the vestibular organ. Background: To date there has not been a study which compares vibratory velocity measurements through an intact ossicular chain to the level of the round window. This study attempted to quantify the degree of mechanical energy transmission and suspected dissipation through the ossicular chain and vestibular organ through incus, stapes, and round window velocity measurements in response to sound stimulus. Methods: Five thawed human temporal bones with intact ossicular chain and tympanic membrane underwent complete mastoidectomy and a facial recess approach. A laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV) was mounted on the operating microscope to measure vibration of incus, stapes, and round window in response to a sound stimulus within the external auditory canal. Sound stimulus frequencies ranged from 0.5 to 4 kHz at 90 dB SPL. Results: Vibration velocity was measured across the frequency range for each incus, stapes, and round window. Vibration velocity curves obtained over the frequency range were similar for each of the bones with a notable resonant frequency around 2 kHz. The incus and stapes curve amplitudes were nearly identical with similar maximum velocity and frequency at which this maximal velocity was noted. Round window vibration velocity demonstrated a unique peak velocity. Transfer function measurements of the stapes and round window demonstrated markedly similar curves. The variation in velocity between temporal bones in response to the standardized stimulus was more dramatic in the round window measurements when compared with the incus and stapes. Conclusions: This study supports the concept that round window transfer function is equivalent to stapes footplate transfer function when subjected to the same acoustic stimuli. This study also demonstrates that the round window is a much more difficult target to measure when using LDV technology and improvements in experimental design are required to better understand round window physiology in relation to transfer of acoustic vibratory stimulus transferred throughout the middle ear. A complete and thorough understanding of the biophysical properties of the middle and inner ear are critical for optimal ossiculoplasty outcomes and the development of future ossicular prosthetics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.