The purpose of this study was to define the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and plain radiographs (X-ray [XR]) in identifying an osteochondral defect or loose body in patients undergoing operative treatment for patellar instability. A total of 87 patients treated operatively for patellar instability with medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction between 2015 and 2019 were identified. Inclusion criteria were evidence of clinical patellar instability, preoperative XR and MRI studies, and concomitant diagnostic knee arthroscopy and MPFL reconstruction performed to address patellar instability. Patients were excluded if they had a history of prior procedure for patellar instability on the surgical knee, underwent MPFL reconstruction without concomitant diagnostic knee arthroscopy, or had an anterior cruciate ligament or posterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. Operative notes and arthroscopic images were reviewed to identify osteochondral or chondral injuries and loose bodies noted during diagnostic arthroscopy. The primary outcome was the identification of intra-articular loose bodies, chondral injury, or osteochondral defect on preoperative plain radiographs and MRI in patients with patellar instability. All MRIs were performed on a 3T MRI. The sensitivity and specificity of identifying loose bodies on MRI were 0.52 and 0.92 and on XR were 0.23 and 0.98, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of identifying osteochondral lesions on MRI were 0.43 and 0.81 and on XR were 0.08 and 0.97, respectively. Of the 87 available reports, 45 (51%) described performing chondroplasty for Outerbridge grade II/III chondral lesions on diagnostic arthroscopy. In conclusion, MRI and XR are poorly sensitive at identifying loose bodies or osteochondral defects after patellar dislocations. The poor sensitivity of imaging studies must be considered when determining whether or not to recommend operative management to a patient with patellar instability. This is a Level IV, diagnostic study.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKI) are rare but devastating injuries that have a potential to cause long-term sequelae and significant morbidity. Frequently occurring concomitantly with knee dislocations (KD), MLKI have many risk factors that influence their incidence and treatment outcomes. Proper understanding of these risk factors can assist the surgeon with evaluation, surgical planning, and managing patient expectations both pre- and postoperatively. The purpose of this review is fourfold: (1) identify the risk factors and injuries associated with MLKI, (2) describe factors implicated in the treatment of MLKI, (3) report the effect of these risk factors on outcomes of MLKI, and (4) provide a brief insight into MLKI at our tertiary referral academic care center. This was a retrospective review of literature relevant to MLKI. Studies that described injuries, risk factors, treatment techniques, or outcomes associated with MLKI were included in our review. A total of 35 studies (consisting of level 3 and 4 evidence) published between 2009 and 2020 were found and included in our analysis. In addition, 25 patients who underwent treatment for MLKI at the University of Chicago Medical Center between December 2015 and December 2019 were included in our analysis. MLKI tend to occur in the younger male population. Increasing age, body mass index, and severity of the injury have been correlated with worse functional and patient-reported outcomes. Operative treatment is indicated for MLKI; however, timing and repair versus reconstruction is still debated, and is often decided on a patient by patient basis. Retrospective cohort studies have indicated that reconstruction may be favored; however, further more rigorous studies are needed to better characterize this finding. MLKIs are devastating injuries with significant variability in presentation, treatment, and outcome. Variations in these are largely attributable to the mechanism and severity of injury, timing, and surgeon preference. A holistic approach, and understanding of the present literature, is required to best optimize patient outcome.