The multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) score measures 12 proteins involved in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to assess disease activity (DA). Previous studies demonstrated correlations between MBDA and clinical DA scores with some RA therapies. In this analysis, the relationship between DA and MBDA scores and changes in MBDA component biomarkers were evaluated in tocilizumab (TCZ)-treated patients. Patients from the ACT-RAY study were included in this analysis if they had DA measures and serum collected at pre-specified time points with sufficient serum for MBDA testing at ≥1 visit. Descriptive statistics, associations between outcomes, and percentage agreement between DA categories were calculated. Seventy-eight patients were included and were similar to the ACT-RAY population. Correlations between MBDA score and DAS28-CRP were ρ = 0.50 at baseline and ρ = 0.26 at week 24. Agreement between low/moderate/high categories of MBDA score and DAS28-CRP was observed for 77.1 % of patients at baseline and 23.7 % at week 24. Mean changes from baseline to weeks 4, 12, and 24 were proportionately smaller for MBDA score than DAS28-CRP. Unlike some other MBDA biomarkers, interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentrations increased in most patients during TCZ treatment. Correlations and agreement between MBDA and DAS28-CRP or CDAI scores were lower at week 24 versus baseline. The proportionately smaller magnitude of response observed for MBDA score versus DAS28-CRP may be due to the influence of the increase in IL-6 concentrations on MBDA score. Thus, MBDA scores obtained during TCZ treatment should be interpreted cautiously and in the context of available clinical information.

ObjectiveTo clarify the relevance of measuring interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) and C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels in order to predict clinical response to tocilizumab (TCZ) in rheumatoid arthritis patients.MethodsIn a pooled, post hoc analysis of 5 pivotal trials of TCZ, we examined the distributions of baseline serum concentrations of IL‐6 and CRP, stratified by randomized treatment group, and week 24 Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) status (DAS28 <2.6 versus DAS28 ≥2.6). Relationships between early biomarker changes and later changes in DAS28 scores were evaluated using Spearman's correlations and scatterplots. Finally, percentage changes from baseline in IL‐6 and CRP levels were evaluated.ResultsDistributions of baseline IL‐6 and CRP levels were similar for patients who achieved DAS28 scores <2.6 within 6 months of TCZ initiation and those who did not. Correlations between early changes in these 2 biomarkers and change in DAS28 scores were low (rho < 0.3 for all). Mean percentage increases from baseline in IL‐6 concentrations were observed in all treatment groups (highest in the 8 mg/kg dose group); mean percentage decreases in CRP concentrations were greater at week 2 and at all visits for the 8 mg/kg dose group.ConclusionBaseline serum concentrations of IL‐6 and CRP may not be predictive of clinical outcomes after TCZ treatment. Data demonstrate the efficacy of TCZ in patients across a broad range of baseline serum IL‐6 and CRP concentrations. Similarly, changes in these biomarkers after TCZ dosing are expected and may or may not correspond to changes in other clinical signs and symptoms. These results complement previous reports describing the complex interactions among biomarker changes, other therapeutic mechanisms of action, and clinical outcomes.

Safety concerns associated with many drugs indicated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be attenuated by the early identification of toxicity through routine laboratory monitoring; however, a comprehensive review of the recommended monitoring guidelines for the different available RA therapies is currently unavailable. The aim of this review is to summarize the current guidelines for laboratory monitoring in patients with RA and to provide an overview of the laboratory abnormality profiles associated with each drug indicated for RA. Recommendations for the frequency of laboratory monitoring of serum lipids, liver transaminases, serum creatinine, neutrophil counts, and platelet counts in patients with RA were compiled from a literature search for published recommendations and guidelines as well as the prescribing information for each drug. Laboratory abnormality profiles for each drug were compiled from the prescribing information for each drug and a literature search including meta-analyses and primary clinical trials data.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis reflects a group of clinically heterogeneous arthritides hallmarked by elevated concentrations of circulating immune complexes. In this study, the circulating immune complex proteome was examined to elucidate disease-associated proteins that are overexpressed in patients with an aggressive, and at times destructive, disease phenotype. To solve this proteome, circulating immune complexes were isolated from the sera of patients with chronic, erosive or early-onset, aggressive disease and from patients in medical remission or healthy controls subsequent to protein separation by 2-DE. Thirty-seven protein spots were overexpressed in the circulating immune complexes of the aggressive disease groups as compared to controls, 28 of which have been confidently identified to date. Proteolytic fragments of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, serotransferrin, and α-1-antitrypsin have been identified among others. In total, these 28 putative disease-associated proteins most definitely contribute to immune complex formation and likely have a significant role in disease etiology and pathogenesis. Moreover, these proteins represent markers of aggressive disease, which could aid in diagnosis and management strategies, and potential therapeutic targets to prevent or control disease outcome. This is the first in-depth analysis of the circulating immune complex proteome in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

The production of autoreactive antibodies from self-reactive B cells results in the formation of immune complexes that deposit in tissue and fix complement, contributing to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Earlier mouse models emphasize the importance of autoreactive antibodies formed against "self" proteins that serve as a source for T cell-mediated immune response, stemming from cross-reactivity and resulting in B cell activity. However, more recent models suggest the need for both autoantibodies and the initiation of the inflammatory cascade via the alternative complement pathway, which is unbridled as the cartilage lacks the usual regulatory proteins of the complement system. Furthermore, deficiencies in specific complement proteins could lead to an escape from negative selection by these self-reactive B cells. Moreover, the classical complement pathway establishes chemotactic gradients by which inflammatory cells follow and accumulate in the synovial fluid where they engulf immune complexes and release proteolytic enzymes. In addition, the processing of circulating immune complexes either via Fc receptor or CR1 and opsonization by complement fragments plays a key role in determining the fate of immune status. In addition, complement proteins are a major determinant in the size and solubility of an immune complex, which also affects clearance. The evidence regarding intra-articular activation of the complement system in RA provides the possibility to pharmacologically manipulate various parts of the complement system for therapeutic purposes and potential therapeutic targets for the control of inflammation and the prevention of joint destruction.