The histopathological classification of ovarian surface epithelial carcinomas (referred to hereafter as 'ovarian carcinoma') has shifted over the past 10 years to reflect more clearly our understanding of molecular events during carcinogenesis. Ovarian carcinoma is no longer viewed as a single entity but as multiple disease processes, with each having different molecular pathways altered during oncogenesis, resulting in differences in clinical and pathological features, such as biomarker expression, pattern of spread and response to chemotherapy. There are five subtypes of ovarian carcinoma that are sufficiently distinct and well-characterized that they should be considered to be different diseases, i.e. high-grade serous, clear cell, endometrioid, mucinous and low-grade serous, from most to least common, respectively. This review summarizes the molecular abnormalities of these five ovarian carcinoma subtypes, relating them to clinical and pathological features.

Objective. This article investigates the relationship between descriptive representation and the political attitudes of Latino citizens in the United States. We specifically test the impact of both panethnic and national-origin specific representation on Latino citizens' attitudes toward government and their individual-level identity. Methods. Original data on the ethnicity and national origin of Latino mayors in 2005 and 2006 was merged with the Latino National Survey (2006) to analyze the impact of descriptive representation on four specific outcomes: perceptions of political alienation, efficacy, political commonality, and linked fate. Results. We find a meaningful relationship between descriptive representation and the political attitudes of Latino citizens. However, the impact of representation varies by level (panethnic vs. national origin) and the particular outcome of interest. Conclusions. By developing a Latino-specific model of descriptive representation, this investigation improves our knowledge of how recent increases in the number of Latinos elected to public office have impacted the Latino electorate.

Previous clinical and experimental studies suggested that invasion of the brain by metastatic melanoma may follow the external surfaces of vascular channels, that is, angiotropic extravascular migratory metastasis. Such angiotropic invasion seemss analogous to that of neoplastic glial invasion of the nervous system. We, therefore, have retrospectively investigated 20 primary melanoma cases and their respective metastatic brain lesions. The following parameters were analyzed in each primary melanoma: presence of angiotropism, Breslow thickness, Clark level, mitotic rate, sentinel lymph node (SLN) status, and time interval between the primary lesion and the metastasis. The metastatic brain lesions were examined for the presence of angiotropism. Of the 20 cases, 14 showed angiotropism in the primary lesion. The angiotropic group had a significantly deeper Breslow thickness (median 4.4 mm vs. 1.4 mm, P < 0.01) and was more mitotically active (median 11 vs. 4.7 mitoses/mm, P = 0.04). Interestingly, the angiotropic group had an average time lapse of 33 months from the primary lesion to the brain metastasis, whereas the nonangiotropic group had a 57-month time interval. Although the Kaplan-Meier analysis failed to show a survival difference in this small cohort (P = 0.235), there was a trend toward significance. Seven of 20 brain metastases showed angiotropism; however, no significant correlation between angiotropism in the primary melanomas and the corresponding metastatic lesions could be demonstrated. Indeed, angiotropism in the brain metastases was difficult to assess because the available material were generally small partial biopsy samplings and many showed conspicuous necrosis. Ten melanoma patients underwent SLN biopsy. The 3 of 6 positive cases in the angiotropic group had an average time lapse of 32 months from the primary lesion to the brain metastasis, whereas the 4 positive SLN biopsies in the nonangiotropic group had an average of 63 months. This preliminary study of angiotropism in primary melanomas and their corresponding brain metastasis shows a striking trend suggesting that angiotropism in primary melanomas may predict the rapid development of brain metastases. This study also has demonstrated the difficulty in studying angiotropism in melanoma brain metastases because of small sample sizes and abundance of necrotic tissue. The authors are in the process of collecting larger and more representative numbers of melanoma brain metastases for further investigations.