Objective Our objective was to measure the sensitivity and specificity of a six-item “pregnancy checklist” at excluding early or luteal-phase pregnancy among women with a negative urine pregnancy test who were initiating contraception. Study design This was a secondary analysis of the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, a prospective cohort study of 9,256 women in the St. Louis region. Women who had a negative urine pregnancy test on the day of enrollment were included in this analysis. Women with a positive urine pregnancy test or without urine pregnancy testing were excluded. We identified all luteal-phase pregnancies that occurred among women with a negative urine pregnancy test. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and likelihood ratios of the pregnancy checklist for excluding luteal-phase pregnancies. Results There were 6,929 women included in this analysis; 69% of these women met at least one checklist criterion to exclude pregnancy (“negative screen”). There were 36 luteal-phase pregnancies (0.5%) subsequently diagnosed among women with a negative urine pregnancy test. The sensitivity and specificity of the checklist were 77.7% and 69.1%, respectively. The negative predictive value of the checklist was 99.8% and the positive predictive value was 1.3%. Conclusion Among women with a negative urine pregnancy test, the pregnancy checklist can be used to safely exclude more than 99% of early pregnancies at the time of contraceptive initiation.

Background Uninsured patients requiring long-term intravenous (IV) antimicrobials do not have access to outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) and often remain hospitalized for the duration of their treatment, transition to inferior oral antimicrobials, or leave against medical advice. A hospital-supported self-administered OPAT (S-OPAT) program was piloted in uninsured patients to decrease hospital length of stay and improve access to care. Methods Uninsured adult patients requiring IV antimicrobials were enrolled in an S-OPAT pilot study from July 2019 to April 2020. Patients with drug use history or documented non-adherence were excluded. S-OPAT patients attended weekly clinic visits for blood draws, dressing changes, and medication supply. The measured outcomes were hospital days saved, and potential income generated by earlier discharges. The latter was calculated by multiplying the number of hospital days saved by the daily charge for a hospital bed to insured patients. Results Seventeen patients were enrolled in S-OPAT, 14 (82%) were males, 8 (47%) were black, and the mean age was 39 years. The most common indication for OPAT was bone and joint infections in 12 (71%), and most commonly used antibiotic was ceftriaxone in 12 (71%) patients (Table). Early discontinuation occurred in 3 (17%) patients due to clinic visit non-adherence resulted in 2 (12%) and adverse drug events in 1 (6%). Only one (6%) patient had unplanned hospital readmission during OPAT. Transition to S-OPAT resulted in 533 hospital days avoided, and a net saving of approximately $900,000. Conclusion S-OPAT model is safe and can enhance care for uninsured patients while optimizing health-system resources. Table Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures