Background: Current guidelines recommend coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring for stratification of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk only in patients with borderline to intermediate risk score by the pooled cohort equation with low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) of 70 to 190 mg/dL. It remains unknown if CAC or thoracic aorta calcification (TAC), detected on routine chest computed tomography, can provide further risk stratification in patients with LDL-C≥190 mg/dL. Methods: From a multisite medical center, we retrospectively identified all patients from March 2005 to June 2021 age ≥40 years, without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and LDL-C≥190 mg/dL who had non-gated non-contrast chest computed tomography within 3 years of LDL-C measurement. Ordinal CAC and TAC scores were measured by visual inspection. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox-regression models were built to ascertain the association of CAC and TAC scores with all-cause mortality. Results: We included 811 patients with median age 59 (53–68) years, 262 (32.3%) were male, and LDL-C median level was 203 (194–217) mg/dL. Patients were followed for 6.2 (3.29–9.81) years, and 109 (13.4%) died. Overall, 376 (46.4%) of patients had CAC=0 and 226 (27.9%) had TAC=0. All-cause mortality increased with any CAC and moderate to severe TAC. In a multivariate model, patients with CAC had a significantly higher mortality compared with those without CAC: mild hazard ratio (HR), 1.71 (1.03–2.83), moderate HR, 2.12 (1.14–3.94), and severe HR, 3.49 (1.94–6.27). Patients with moderate TAC (HR, 2.34 [1.19–4.59]) and those with severe TAC (HR, 3.02 [1.36–6.74]) had higher mortality than those without TAC. Conclusions: In patients without history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and LDL-C≥190 mg/dL, the presence and severity of CAC and TAC are independently associated with all-cause mortality.
Introduction: The proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method has been validated for quantifying severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) in orifices with circular geometry. However, functional MR often has an elliptical orifice, which alters the proximal isovelocity contour from a hemisphere to a hemi-ellipsoid. Studies have previously shown that PISA underestimates regurgitant flow (RF) and effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) in functional MR. Hypothesis: The application of a simplified hemi-ellipsoid formula based on biplane color Doppler improves accuracy in calculating RF and ERO across elliptical orifices. Methods: An in vitro model for flow quantification was used for all experiments. Multiple size orifices with minor to major ratios ranging from 1:1 to 1:9 were constructed by 3D printing. Flow was adjusted at multiple intervals to generate peak flow velocities ranging from 4.1 to 5.5 m/s and aliasing velocities from 12 to 18 cm/s. Isovelocity contours were evaluated by biplane color Doppler (Figure 1A). RF and ERO were estimated using the traditional hemispheric PISA (HS-PISA) formula and a simplified hemiellipsoid formula (HE-PISA) based on two orthogonal diameter measurements (Figure 1A and 1B). The estimated RF and ERO values were compared and validated against those derived from a magnetic flowmeter (FM). Results: Isovelocity contours changed from hemisphere to hemi-ellipsoid orifices with increasing ellipticity ratios. HS-PISA significantly underestimated RF (116 ± 27 vs FM 155 ± 20 ml/s) and ERO (26 ± 4 vs FM 34 ± 1 mm 2 ). Underestimation was significantly reduced by HE-PISA (135 ± 17 ml/s and 30 ± 2.5 mm 2 , both p<0.001). Conclusions: A simplified hemi-ellipsoid PISA method provides more accurate assessment of RF and ERO in regurgitant orifices with non-circular geometries.
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery calcium scoring (CAC) has garnered attention in the diagnostic approach to chest pain patients. However, little is known about the interplay between zero CAC, sex, race, ethnicity, and quantitative coronary plaque analysis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis from our computed tomography registry of patients with stable angina without prior myocardial infarction or revascularization undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography at Montefiore Healthcare System. Follow-up end points collected included invasive angiography, type-1 myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular and all-cause death. RESULTS: A total of 2249 patients were included (66% female). The median follow-up was 5.5 years. The median age of those without CAC was 52 years (interquartile range, 44–59) and 60 years (interquartile range, 53–68) in those with CAC. Most patients were Hispanic (58%), and the rest were non-Hispanic Black (28%), non-Hispanic White (10%), and non-Hispanic Asian (5%). The majority had CAC=0 (55%). The negative predictive value of CAC=0 was 92.8%, 99.9%, and 99.9% for any plaque, obstructive coronary artery stenosis, and the composite outcome of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization, respectively. Among patients without CAC (n=1237), 89 patients (7%) had evidence of plaque on their coronary computed tomography angiography with a median low-attenuation noncalcified plaque burden of 4% (2–7). There were no significant differences in the negative predictive value for CAC=0 by sex, race, or ethnicity. Patients with ≥2 risk factors had higher odds of having plaque with zero CAC. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, no sex, race, or ethnicity differences were demonstrated in the negative predictive value of a zero CAC; however, patients with ≥2 risk factors had a higher prevalence of plaque. A small percentage (7%) of symptomatic patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography with zero CAC had noncalcified coronary plaque, with the implication that caution is needed for downscaling of preventive treatment in patients with zero CAC, chest pain, and multiple risk factors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.