Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi causes typhoid fever in humans. Central to the pathogenicity of serovar Typhi is its capacity to invade intestinal epithelial cells. The role of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the invasion process of serovar Typhi is unclear. In this work, we constructed a series of mutants with defined deletions in genes for the synthesis and polymerization of the O antigen (wbaP, wzy, and wzz) and the assembly of the outer core (waaK, waaJ, waaI, waaB, and waaG). The abilities of each mutant to associate with and enter HEp-2 cells and the importance of the O antigen in serum resistance of serovar Typhi were investigated. We demonstrate here that the presence and proper chain length distribution of the O-antigen polysaccharide are essential for serum resistance but not for invasion of epithelial cells. In contrast, the outer core oligosaccharide structure is required for serovar Typhi internalization in HEp-2 cells. We also show that the outer core terminal glucose residue (Glc II) is necessary for efficient entry of serovar Typhi into epithelial cells. The Glc I residue, when it becomes terminal due to a polar insertion in the waaB gene affecting the assembly of the remaining outer core residues, can partially substitute for Glc II to mediate bacterial entry into epithelial cells. Therefore, we conclude that a terminal glucose in the LPS core is a critical residue for bacterial recognition and internalization by epithelial cells.
Transgenes that improve quantitative traits have traditionally been evaluated in one or a few genetic backgrounds across multiple environments. However, testing across multiple genetic backgrounds can be equally important to accurately quantify the value of a transgene for breeding objectives. Creating near-isogenic lines across a wide germplasm space is costly and time consuming, which renders it impractical during early stages of testing. In this experiment, we evaluate three approaches to sample the genetic space while concurrently testing across environments. We created both transgenic and non-transgenic doubled haploid lines, F2:3lines, and bulk F3families to determine if all methods resulted in similar estimation of transgene value and to identify the number of yield trial plots from each method necessary to obtain a stable estimate of the transgene value. With one exception, the three methods consistently estimated a similar effect of the transgene. We suggest that bulked F3lines topcrossed to a tester inbred is the most effective method to estimate the value of a transgene across both genetic space and environments.
Transgenes have been successfully commercialized for qualitatively inherited insect and herbicide resistance traits that show similar effects across genetic backgrounds. However, for quantitative traits like yield, genetic background may affect the measured transgene value. In this paper, we evaluated whether different genetic backgrounds impact the estimated value of a transgene for grain yield, ear height, and anthesis-silking interval for maize by developing isogenic pairs of lines with and without a transgene and testing them in hybrid combination with non-transgenic lines from a complementary heterotic group across eleven environments in the USA. Over all hybrid combinations, the transgene increased yield by 0.2 Mg ha−1. Across multiple non-transgenic lines of the opposing heterotic group, the transgene effect within a line pair ranged from an increase of 0.8 Mg ha−1for the NSS4 and SS7 transgenic lines to a reduction of 0.3 Mg ha−1for the NSS5 transgenic line when compared to their non-transgenic isoline. Transgenic hybrids were often taller than non-transgenic hybrids (P<0.05). Anthesis to silking interval was reduced by 4□C growing degree units overall, but no transgene × genotype interaction was detected among line pairs. Our results show the importance of testing transgene efficacy across a large sample of elite hybrid pairs to assess the gene’s value. By only testing in a specific hybrid background, as may be done for qualitative traits like insect resistance, transgenes could be erroneously advanced or eliminated.
Transgenes have been successfully commercialized for qualitatively inherited insect and herbicide resistance traits that show similar effects across genetic backgrounds. However, for quantitative traits like yield, genetic background may affect the measured transgene value. In this paper, we evaluated whether different genetic backgrounds impact the estimated value of a transgene for grain yield, plant height, and anthesis‐silking interval for maize by developing isogenic pairs of lines with and without a transgene and testing them in hybrid combination with non‐transgenic lines from a complementary heterotic group across eleven environments in the United States. Over all hybrid combinations, the transgene increased yield by 0.2 Mg ha−1. Across multiple non‐transgenic lines of the opposing heterotic group, the transgene effect within a line pair ranged from an increase of 0.8 Mg ha−1 for the NSS4 (non‐stiff stalk) and SS7 (stiff stalk) transgenic lines to a reduction of 0.3 Mg ha−1 for the NSS5 transgenic line when compared to their non‐transgenic isoline. Transgenic hybrids were often taller than non‐transgenic hybrids (p < 0.05). Anthesis to silking interval was reduced by four growing degree days overall, but no transgene × genotype interaction was detected among line pairs. Our results show the importance of testing transgene efficacy across a large sample of elite hybrid pairs to assess the gene's value. By only testing in a specific hybrid background, as may be done for qualitative traits like insect resistance, transgenes could be erroneously advanced or eliminated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.