Aims: To evaluate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with stage IIIC epithelial ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancer (EOC) who underwent a laparoscopy to assess surgical resectability prior to Primary Debulking Surgery (PDS) or Interval Debulking Surgery (IDS). Methods: Retrospective cohort study that included all women with stage IIIC EOC treated at our center between 2000 and 2010. Patients were classified in groups: PDS, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with IDS, NACT without IDS; and then sub-classified based on residual tumor (RT). A laparoscopy to assess resectability was performed before PDS and IDS. Results: Among 111 patients included, 66 underwent PDS, and 45 were treated with NACT, 80% of them receiving subsequent IDS. OS was 75.6 months in the PDS group, and 52.8 months for IDS group (p = 0.100); the PFS was 30 months and 19.2 months respectively (p = 0.049). Median OS was 104.4 and 52.8 months for patients with optimal cytoreduction (RT = 0) in the PDS and IDS group respectively (p < 0.05). Laparoscopy did not modify the preoperative consideration for PDS; however, 9 laparotomies were avoided based on laparoscopic findings after NACT. Conclusion: Laparoscopy for the assessment of surgical resectability in stage IIIC EOC has no impact on survival; but it still could be useful for the reduction of unnecessary laparotomies after NACT.

No abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer presents different histological subtypes, mainly serous, mucinous, endometriod, clear cell, mixed and undifferentiated cell. Molecular genetic studies have led to a new paradigm based on a dualistic model of ovarian carcinogenesis. There is a causal association between endometriosis and specific types of ovarian carcinomas, but the magnitude of the risk is low and endometriosis is not considered a premalignant lesion. Among the endometriosis-associated ovarian tumors adenocarcinoma is the most common (Endometrioid and clear cell) (70%), sarcoma is the second most common malignancy (12%) and rare cell types 6%. The gynecologist should pay special attention to identify patients with endometriosis who may be at an increased risk for ovarian cancer.

Background. The standard of care for patients (pts) with an ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) after breast conserving therapy (BCT) is a salvage mastectomy. However there is no solid data providing a clear advantage of radical surgery for IBTR in terms of the outcome for patients with isolated local recurrence after BCT. Nevertheless, there is a growing interest in the feasibility of repeating BCT for these patients (pts). We analyzed the oncological outcomes of repeated breast-conserving therapy (rBCT) related to the immunohistochemical subtype. Materials and methods. Between 2014 and 2020, 35 pts were selected for a 2nd BCT, a new lumpectomy with accelerated partial breast re-irradiation (APBrI), and prospectively followed in three university hospitals in Barcelona. Inclusion criteria were pts older than 50y with a late (&gt; 48m from primary treatment) isolated IBTR less than 2cm, without having primary major radiotherapy toxicity. Oncological outcomes were analyzed. Results. At IBTR, median age was 65y and median time to ITBR was 154m. Patients characteristics are shown in table 1. Tumor’s recurrence was DCIS in 5 pts (14.3%) and invasive carcinoma in 30 pts (85.7%), where Luminal A in 10 pts (33.3%), Luminal B-HER2 negative in 12 pts (40%), Luminal B-HER2 positive in 2 (6.7%), non-Luminal HER2 positive in 3 (10%) and triple negative in 3 (10%). With a median follow-up of 37 months, there were 4 relapses (11.4%), one was a 2nd IBTR (2.85%) after in-situ IBTR, and 3 were metastatic recurrences (8.6%), two after invasive and one after in-situ IBTR. Both metastatic progressions after invasive IBTR, were hormone receptor positive and HER2 negative (Luminal B). There were 2 deaths not related with breast cancer. The 2nd IBTR rate was 2.85%. Five-year regional-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival was 82.4% (95% IC 52.6 - 94.4 %), %, 84.6% (95% IC 51 - 96 %) and 93.3% (95% IC 61.2 - 99%), respectively. Conclusion. Conservative treatment with breast conserving surgery and APBrI for isolated IBTR after BCT seems like a feasible technique as an alternative to mastectomy in selected patients. Second local recurrences and overall survival are similar to the rates described for salvage mastectomy for isolated ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence. In this cohort of patients, the immunohistochemical subtype tumors with poor prognosis (HER2 positive and triple negative) did not show increase in the local recurrence rate. Table 1.Patients Characteristicsn%Histology TypeIDC2777.1ILC0DCIS514.3Others38.6Differentiation gradeWell differentiated1028.6Moderately differentiated1851.4Poorly differentiated720Estrogen-receptor statusPositive2880Negative720Progesteron-receptor statusPositive1645.7Negative1748.6Unknown25.7HER2 statusOver-expressed617.1Non-over-expressed2674.3Unknown38.6Ki67&lt; 20 %1748.6&gt; 20 %1337.2Unknown514.3IHC subtypeLuminal A1033.3Luminal B1240Luminal B-HER2 positive26.7Non-luminal HER2 positive310Triple negative310IBTR locatedSame quadrant1748.6Different quadrant1645.7Unknwon25.7APBrI3D-CRT927.3IORT26.1IMRT2266.7 Citation Format: Martin Espinosa-Bravo, Victoria Reyes Lopez, Clara Morales Comas, Joaquín Rivero Déniz, Javier de La Torre Fernández de Vega, Irene Vives Roselló, Christian Sisó Raber, Manuel Altabas Gonzalez, Alexandra Giraldo Marin, Inma Alonso, Nuria Argudo, Pau Nicolau, Manel Algara, Xavier Sanz, Xavier Caparrós, Gabriela Oses, Jordi Saez, María Vernet-Tomas, Meritxell Mollà. Safety of conservative surgery with accelerated partial breast re-irradiation for isolated ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence regardless of immunohistochemical subtype. A multicentric prospective study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-09.