The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed how we view our consultations. To reduce the risk of spread in the most vulnerable patients (those with heart disease) and health personnel, most face-to-face consultations have been replaced by telemedicine consultations. Although this change has been rapidly introduced, it will most likely become a permanent feature of clinical practice. Nevertheless, there remain serious doubts about organizational and legal issues, as well as the possibilities for improvement etc. In this consensus document of the Spanish Society of Cardiology, we attempt to provide some keys to improve the quality of care in this new way of working, reviewing the most frequent heart diseases attended in the cardiology outpatient clinic and proposing some minimal conditions for this health care process. These heart diseases are ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and arrhythmias. In these 3 scenarios, we attempt to clarify the basic issues that must be checked during the telephone interview, describe the patients who should attend in person, and identify the criteria to refer patients for follow-up in primary care. This document also describes some improvements that can be introduced in telemedicine consultations to improve patient care.

No abstract

Intracardiac thrombus is a potentially life-threatening condition, with a high risk of embolic complications. Although vitamin K antagonists have been traditionally used for the treatment of intracardiac thrombus, they have relevant disadvantages that limit their use. Rivaroxaban is a once daily oral anticoagulant, currently indicated for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, and for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. We present the case of a 78-year-old man with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, heart failure and creatinine clearance of 40 ml/min, anticoagulated with rivaroxaban 15 mg/day as the patient had very difficult access to hematologic controls. The transthoracic echocardiogram showed dilated left ventricle, severe left ventricular dysfunction and two images of thrombus, which disappeared after 4 weeks of treatment with rivaroxaban. To our knowledge, this is the first case reported regarding the resolution of left ventricular thrombosis with rivaroxaban.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been demonstrated to be more effective and safer than vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). This meta-analysis aims to assess the effect of DOACS vs. VKA in patients ≥ 80 and AF. Primary endpoints were stroke or systemic embolism and all-cause death. Secondary endpoints included major bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding. A random-effects model was selected due to significant heterogeneity. A total of 147,067 patients from 16 studies were included, 71,913 (48.90%) treated with DOACs and 75,154 with VKA (51.10%). The stroke rate was significantly lower in DOACs group compared with warfarin group (Relative risk (RR): 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63–0.82; p < 0.001). All-cause mortality was significantly lower in DOACs group compared with warfarin group (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.70–0.96; p = 0.012). Compared to warfarin, DOACs were not associated with reductions in major bleeding (RR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.69–1.04; p = 0.108) or gastrointestinal bleeding risk (RR: 1.08, 95% CI 0.76–1.53; p = 0.678) but a 43% reduction of intracranial bleeding (RR: 0.47, IC 95% 0.36–0.60; p < 0.001) was observed. Our meta-analysis demonstrates that DOACs are effective and safe with statistical superiority when compared with warfarin in octogenarians with AF.

Objectives To assess the efficacy of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP1‐RAs) and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, administered without metformin on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients. Methods A systematic review was performed according to Cochrane's methodological standards. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on adult type 2 diabetes patients, assessing the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1‐RAs compared to other glucose‐lowering drugs and/or RCTs that presented data of a subgroup of type 2 diabetes patients without metformin use at baseline. The main outcome was the reduction of the risk of any major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) reported individually or as a composite outcome. Results Five RCTs including 50,725 type 2 diabetes patients, of whom 10,013 had not received metformin, were included in this meta‐analysis. Three of these studies assessed the efficacy of GLP1‐RAs and two of SGLT2 inhibitors. In patients without metformin at baseline, GLP1‐RAs in comparison with placebo reduced the risk of MACE significantly by 20% (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.71–0.89). SGLT2 inhibitors also significantly reduced the risk of MACE by 32% (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.57–0.81). Conclusions SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1‐RAs provided without metformin at baseline may reduce the risk of MACE in comparison with placebo in type 2 diabetes patients at increased risk of cardiovascular events.