Objective The purpose of this study is to co-evaluate resident technical errors and decision-making capabilities during placement of a subclavian central venous catheter (CVC). We hypothesize that there will be significant correlations between scenario based decision making skills, and technical proficiency in central line insertion. We also predict residents will have problems in anticipating common difficulties and generating solutions associated with line placement. Design Participants were asked to insert a subclavian central line on a simulator. After completion, residents were presented with a real life patient photograph depicting CVC placement and asked to anticipate difficulties and generate solutions. Error rates were analyzed using chi-square tests and a 5% expected error rate. Correlations were sought by comparing technical errors and scenario based decision making. Setting This study was carried out at seven tertiary care centers. Participants Study participants (N=46) consisted of largely first year research residents that could be followed longitudinally. Second year research and clinical residents were not excluded. Results Six checklist errors were committed more often than anticipated. Residents performed an average of 1.9 errors, significantly more than the 1 error, at most, per person expected (t(44)=3.82, p<.001). The most common error was performance of the procedure steps in the wrong order (28.5%, P<.001). Some of the residents (24%) had no errors, 30% committed one error, and 46 % committed more than one error. The number of technical errors committed negatively correlated with the total number of commonly identified difficulties and generated solutions (r(33)= −.429, p=.021, r(33)= −.383, p=.044 respectively). Conclusions Almost half of the surgical residents committed multiple errors while performing subclavian CVC placement. The correlation between technical errors and decision making skills suggests a critical need to train residents in both technique and error management. ACGME Competencies Medical Knowledge, Practice Based Learning and Improvement, Systems Based Practice

No abstract

This study shows that force discrimination in a defined VR environment correlates to needle insertion time, idle time, and hand smoothness when performing subclavian central line placement. Fine motor force discrimination may serve as a valid and objective assessment of the skills required for successful needle insertion when placing central lines.

No abstract

The surgical process remains elusive to many. This paper presents two independent empirical investigations where psychomotor skill metrics were used to quantify elements of the surgical process in a procedural context during surgical tasks in a simulated environment. The overarching goal of both investigations was to address the following hypothesis: Basic motion metrics can be used to quantify specific aspects of the surgical process including instrument autonomy, psychomotor efficiency, procedural readiness, and clinical errors. Electromagnetic motion tracking sensors were secured to surgical trainees’ (N = 64) hands for both studies, and several motion metrics were investigated as a measure of surgical skill. The first study assessed performance during a bowel repair and laparoscopic ventral hernia (LVH) repair in comparison to a suturing board task. The second study assessed performance in a VR task in comparison to placement of a subclavian central line. The findings of the first study support our subhypothesis that motion metrics have a generalizable application to surgical skill by showing significant correlations in instrument autonomy and psychomotor efficiency during the suturing task and bowel repair (idle time: r = 0.46, p < 0.05; average velocity: r = 0.57, p < 0.05) and the suturing task and LVH repair (jerk magnitude: r = 0.36, p < 0.05; bimanual dexterity: r = 0.35, p < 0.05). In the second study, performance in VR (steering and jerkiness) correlated to clinical errors (r = 0.58, p < 0.05) and insertion time (r = 0.55, p < 0.05) in placement of a subclavian central line. Both gross (dexterity) and fine motor skills (steering) were found to be important as well as efficiency (i.e., idle time, duration, velocity) when seeking to understand the quality of surgical performance. Both studies support our hypotheses that basic motion metrics can be used to quantify specific aspects of the surgical process and that the use of different technologies and metrics are important for comprehensive investigations of surgical skill.