Canagliflozin provided sustained effects on UGE and FPG over 12 weeks and a transient reduction in plasma volume that was largely attenuated by week 12.
A change in QTc (Bazett) interval from baseline can be demonstrated safely in healthy volunteers after single high doses of fluoroquinolones that achieve approximately 1.5 times the maximum plasma drug concentration that occurs after recommended doses. There is substantial daily variation in both QT and QTc interval, and the magnitude and frequency of changes in QTc interval can depend on the methods used. These factors need to be considered because clinical trials measuring the effects of drugs on QT intervals are used to estimate the risk of using these drugs. Greater changes in QT and QTc intervals after treatment with moxifloxacin compared with levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin are consistent with in vitro observations related to the effect of these drugs on rapid potassium (IK(r)) channels. The clinical relevance of these differences is not known.
The pharmacokinetics of once-daily oral levofloxacin (study A) or intravenous levofloxacin (study B) in 40 healthy male volunteers were investigated in two separate randomized, double-blind, parallel-design, placebo-controlled studies. Levofloxacin at 500 mg or placebo was administered orally or intravenously as a single dose on day 1; daily oral or intravenous dosing resumed on days 4 to 10. In a third study (study C), the comparability of the bioavailabilities of two oral and one intravenous levofloxacin formulations were investigated with 24 healthy male subjects in an open-label, randomized, three-way crossover study. Levofloxacin at 500 mg as a single tablet or an intravenous infusion was administered on day 1; following a 1-week washout period, subjects received the second regimen (i.e., the other oral formulation or the intravenous infusion); the third and final regimen was administered following a 1-week washout period. The concentrations of drug in plasma and urine were measured by validated high-pressure liquid chromatography methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by noncompartmental methods. In both study A (oral levofloxacin) and study B (intravenous levofloxacin), steady state was attained within 48 h after the start of the multiple dosing on day 4. Levofloxacin pharmacokinetics were linear and predictable for the single and multiple 500-mg, once-daily oral and intravenous dosing regimens, and the values of the pharmacokinetic parameters for the oral and intravenous administrations were similar. Study C indicated that levofloxacin was rapidly and completely absorbed from the oral tablets, with mean times to the maximum concentration of drug in serum of approximately 1.5 h and mean absolute bioavailability of > or =99%. These results support the interchangeability of the oral and intravenous routes of levofloxacin administration.
Population pharmacokinetic modeling is a useful approach to obtaining estimates of both population and individual pharmacokinetic parameter values. The potential for relating pharmacokinetic parameters to pharmacodynamic outcome variables, such as efficacy and toxicity, exists. A logistic regression relationship between the probability of a successful clinical and microbiological outcome and the peak concentration-to-MIC ratio (and also the area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]/MIC ratio) has previously been developed for levofloxacin; however, levofloxacin assays for determination of the concentration in plasma are not readily available. We attempted to derive and validate demographic variable models to allow prediction of the peak concentration in plasma and clearance (CL) from plasma for levofloxacin. Two hundred seventy-two patients received levofloxacin intravenously for the treatment of community-acquired infection of the respiratory tract, skin or soft tissue, or urinary tract, and concentrations in plasma, guided by optimal sampling theory, were obtained. Patient data were analyzed by the Non-Parametric Expectation Maximization approach. Maximum a posteriori probability Bayesian estimation was used to generate individual parameter values, including CL. Peak concentrations were simulated from these estimates. The first 172 patients were used to produce demographic models for the prediction of CL and the peak concentration. The remaining 100 patients served as the validation group for the model. A median bias and median precision were calculated. A two-compartment model was used for the population pharmacokinetic analysis. The mean CL and the mean volume of distribution of the central compartment (V 1) were 9.27 liters/h and 0.836 liter/kg, respectively. The mean values for the intercompartmental rate constants, the rate constant from the central compartment to the peripheral compartment (K cp) and the rate constant from the peripheral compartment to the central compartment (K pc), were 0.487 and 0.647 h−1, respectively. The mean peak concentration and the mean AUC values normalized to a dosage of 500 mg every 24 h were 8.67 μg/ml and 72.53 μg · h/ml, respectively. The variables included in the final model for the prediction of CL were creatinine clearance (CLCR), race, and age. The median bias and median precision were 0.5 and 18.3%, respectively. Peak concentrations were predicted by using the demographic model-predicted parameters of CL,V 1, K cp, andK pc, in the simulation. The median bias and the median precision were 3.3 and 21.8%, respectively. A population model of the disposition of levofloxacin has been developed. Population demographic models for the prediction of peak concentration and CL from plasma have also been successfully developed. However, the performance of the model for the prediction of peak concentration was likely insufficient to be of adequate clinical utility. The model for the prediction of CL was relatively robust, with acceptable bias and precision, and explained a reasonable amount of the variance in the CL of levofloxacin from plasma in the population (r 2 = 0.396). Estimated CLCR, age, and race were the final model covariates, with CLCRexplaining most of the population variance in the CL of levofloxacin from plasma. This model can potentially optimize the benefit derived from the pharmacodynamic relationships previously developed for levofloxacin.
The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of doripenem in healthy subjects were evaluated in 2 studies. Study 1 was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled dose-escalation study in which doripenem was administered for 7 days by infusion over 30 minutes (500 mg) or 1 hour (1000 mg). Study 2 was an open-label, randomized, 3-way crossover study in which each subject received a single dose of each of the following doripenem treatments on separate occasions: 500 mg infused over 1 hour, 500 mg infused over 4 hours, and 1000 mg infused over 4 hours. Doripenem exhibited linear pharmacokinetics with concordance between the studies for pharmacokinetic parameters. Doripenem did not accumulate with repeated dosing over 7 days. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for doripenem 500 mg infused over 1 hour versus 4 hours was bioequivalent, and the AUC and Cmax increased proportionally with dose for the 500- and 1000-mg doses administered over 4 hours. These results, along with the stability profile of doripenem, support its use as a prolonged infusion. All regimens of doripenem were safe and well tolerated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.