IntroductionPost-cardiac arrest patients are often exposed to 100% oxygen during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the early post-arrest period. It is unclear whether this contributes to development of pulmonary dysfunction or other patient outcomes.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study including post-arrest patients who survived and were mechanically ventilated at least 24 hours after return of spontaneous circulation. Our primary exposure of interest was inspired oxygen, which we operationalized by calculating the area under the curve of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2AUC) for each patient over 24 hours. We collected baseline demographic, cardiovascular, pulmonary and cardiac arrest-specific covariates. Our main outcomes were change in the respiratory subscale of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (SOFA-R) and change in dynamic pulmonary compliance from baseline to 48 hours. Secondary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge and Cerebral Performance Category at discharge.ResultsWe included 170 patients. The first partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2):FiO2 ratio was 241 ± 137, and 85% of patients had pulmonary failure and 55% had cardiovascular failure at presentation. Higher FiO2AUC was not associated with change in SOFA-R score or dynamic pulmonary compliance from baseline to 48 hours. However, higher FiO2AUC was associated with decreased survival to hospital discharge and worse neurological outcomes. This was driven by a 50% decrease in survival in the highest quartile of FiO2AUC compared to other quartiles (odds ratio for survival in the highest quartile compared to the lowest three quartiles 0.32 (95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.79), P = 0.003).ConclusionsHigher exposure to inhaled oxygen in the first 24 hours after cardiac arrest was not associated with deterioration in gas exchange or pulmonary compliance after cardiac arrest, but was associated with decreased survival and worse neurological outcomes.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0824-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Orthostatic hypertension (OHT) is a clinically important problem increasingly recognized in persons with borderline hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and autonomic neuropathies, and in the elderly. Moreover, the association of OHT with progression of target end-organ damage, especially coronary heart disease and chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the attendant increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CKD risk, is gaining attention but is still underappreciated. There are various mechanisms that contribute to the development of OHT: excessive vascular adrenergic sensitivity, baroreceptor reflex abnormalities, and inappropriate activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, which are also mechanisms that lead to cardiorenal metabolic disease (CRS). While the evidence is compelling for the clinical importance of OHT, more investigation is needed to evaluate the effects of OHT on CKD and CVD. The notion that the development of OHT is a risk factor for the development of CRS raises the need for further clinical and investigational attention to this clinical dilemma.

The metabolic syndrome is a constellation of metabolic and vascular abnormalities that include insulin resistance with compensatory hyperinsulinemia, central or visceral obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, microalbuminuria, and oxidative stress as well as prothrombotic and inflammatory abnormalities that contribute to a hypercoagulable state and systemic endothelial dysfunction. Visceral adipose tissue is now known to secrete into the circulation a number of protein and nonprotein factors that regulate glucose metabolism in traditional insulin-sensitive tissue as well as nontraditional insulin-sensitive tissue including cardiovascular tissue. Collectively, this constellation of factors that lead to metabolic dysregulation contributes to a substantial risk for adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes. The development of a particularly resistant form of hypertension in these individuals can be attributed to a number of factors including vasoconstriction from increased sympathetic activation, proinflammatory cytokines, and inappropriate activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. The management of hypertension in such patients can be challenging and generally requires nonpharmacologic as well as pharmacologic interventions.

No abstract

No abstract