Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor approved in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Approval in the United States, Europe, and additional countries was based on results from the phase III TOURMALINE‐MM1 (C16010) study. Here, joint population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic time‐to‐event (TTE) and discrete time Markov models were developed to describe key safety (rash and diarrhea events, and platelet counts) and efficacy (myeloma protein [M‐protein] and progression‐free survival [PFS]) outcomes observed in TOURMALINE‐MM1. Models reliably described observed safety and efficacy results; prior immunomodulatory drug therapy and race were significant covariates for diarrhea and rash events, respectively, whereas M‐protein dynamics were sufficiently characterized using TTE models of relapse and dropout. Moreover, baseline M‐protein was identified as a significant covariate for observed PFS. The developed framework represents an integrated approach to describing safety and efficacy with MM therapy, enabling the simulation of prospective trials and potential alternate dosing regimens.

No abstract

Ixazomib has been approved in several countries as single‐agent maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, in both posttransplant and transplant‐ineligible settings, based on two phase III studies. In these maintenance studies, patients were initially administered 3 mg ixazomib, escalating to 4 mg if the initial dose level was well tolerated through Cycles 1–4. Here, we report the results of exposure–response analyses of TOURMALINE‐MM4, wherein relationships between exposure and clinical response, dose adjustments, and selected adverse events were evaluated. Similar progression‐free survival benefits were observed across the range of ixazomib exposures achieved in the study. Moreover, increased ixazomib exposures corresponded to a higher probability of maintaining complete response. Exposure was not a significant predictor (P > 0.05) of hematological adverse events (anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia) and peripheral neuropathy; however, higher exposures did correlate to increased probabilities of experiencing diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, rash, and fatigue. While ixazomib exposure was not predictive of dose reductions, lower apparent clearance values (corresponding to higher systemic exposures) were correlated with a reduced likelihood of escalating to the 4 mg dose. Thus, the dose titration approach balanced patient benefit and risk; it ensured that only patients for whom the 3 mg dose was safe/tolerable escalated to the higher dose, while maximizing the fraction of patients (85%) who were able to derive additional clinical benefit at 4 mg. Collectively, these results highlight the value of safety‐driven personalized dosing to maximize patient benefit/risk.