The objective of this work was to conduct a truly rural-based study to evaluate, from our own rural data devoid of influence from urban-based studies, the management of appendiceal masses in a typical peripheral hospital in Nigeria. The study aimed to highlight the results of neglected appendicitis in our community and the occasional difficulty of making a correct preoperative diagnosis. It also sought to draw the attention of the health care practitioner in our community to the importance of continued enlightenment of the people regarding the need to seek medical treatment early. This was a retrospective study, with the setting at St. Victoria Specialist Hospital, Ekwulobia, Anambra State, Nigeria, a rural hospital serving its community. A series of 30 patients who were managed for an appendiceal mass between January 1, 1992 and December 31, 2001, a 10-year period, were included in the study. We identified the cases by reviewing the surgical register. The relevant case notes were retrieved from the Records Department. The following data were extracted for each patient: age and sex; how early the patient presented; the history and presentation of the patient; whether the diagnosis was made before or during surgery; the treatment modality; length of hospital stay; and outcome. The results showed that 13 patients (43.3%) presented more than 1 week after the onset of symptoms. The age range was 15 to 60 years (average 27 years); 13 patients (43.3%) were in the age range of 40-49 years. Twenty men and ten women were treated, giving a male/female ratio of 2:1. The main clinical features were fever, anorexia, pain, tenderness, and a palpable mass in the right iliac fossa. The problem was diagnosed before surgery in 23 patients (76.7%) and during surgery in 7 (23.3%). Treatment modalities were conservative + interval appendectomy in 18 patients (60%); open and close + conservative + interval appendectomy in 3 patients (10%); immediate appendectomy without burying the stump in 2 cases (6.7%); right hemicolectomy (in one 40-year-old woman and one 55-year-old man); and incision and drainage of an appendiceal abscess in 5 patients (16.7%). No deaths were recorded. The study showed that appendical masses are most prevalent during the fifth decade of life and are rare before age 10 and after age 60. More men are affected than women, and most cases can be diagnosed before surgery, although some patients must await more sophisticated diagnostic tools or surgical exploration for diagnosis.
Objectives:To determine the national practice patterns in the management of male urethral stricture disease by the open urethroplasty technique.Materials and Methods:A questionnaire-based national survey of Nigerian urologists was performed during the 19th Annual General Meeting and Scientific Conference of the National Association of Urological Surgeons of Nigeria, held at Ibadan, Southwest Nigeria in 2013.Results:A total of 55 respondents (67.1%) completed the questionnaire. About 43.6% were between the ages of 40 and 49 years. Almost 41.8% had between 5 and 9 years of experience as a reconstructive urologist, and 50.9% performed 1–9 urethroplasties/year. A total of 80 responders reported trauma as the most common etiology for their strictures. About 63.7% preferred to treat strictures after 3–6 months of diagnosis and 67.3% of respondents preferred the combination of retrograde urethrography and voiding cystourethrography for the diagnosis of urethral stricture. Stenting of the urethra was done after urethroplasty using size 16 Fr of 18 Fr silastic catheter; however, the duration of stenting varied among urologists. About 41.8% followed up their patients for a year, and uroflowmetry was used by 36.6% of the responders to follow-up their patients. Stricture recurrence was the most common reported complication by 36.4% of the respondents.Conclusions:In Nigeria, most urethral stricture diseases are treated by open urethroplasties. Very few of these surgeries are performed annually by young urologists. There is no uniformity in the method of diagnosis, stenting, and follow-up after treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.