In HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients, it is recommended to repeat liver biopsy every 3 years when anti-HCV treatment is not indicated. We studied fibrosis progression in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, who were not receiving anti-HCV treatment, on the basis of two successive liver biopsies. Thirty-two patients were retrospectively included. Twenty-six patients (79%) were on antiretroviral treatment at the first biopsy. The mean CD4 cell count was 470 +/- 283/mm(3). Three patients were staged F2 and the remainder F0/F1. The median interval between the two biopsies was 49 (24-80) months. At the second biopsy, the stage distribution was F0 0%, F1 41% (n = 13), F2 34% (n = 11), F3 19% (n = 6) and F4 6% (n = 2). The mean fibrosis progression rate (FPR) was 0.25 points/year. Nine patients (28%) were considered as rapid fibrosis progressors (progression by more than two points) and their FPR was 0.5 point/year; comparison of these subjects with the other 23 patients showed no relation between FPR and age, alcohol consumption, CD4+ cell count, HIV viral load, HCV genotype, aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase. Analysis of the treatment received between the two liver biopsies did not find any correlation between liver FPR and a specific compound. Fifteen patients started anti-HCV therapy based on the second biopsy. Liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients should be evaluated at least every 3 years, as nine of 32 (28%) of our patients progressed by at least two fibrosis points despite a high CD4+ cell count. The second biopsy showed that 15 patients (45%) qualified for anti-HCV therapy. Development of noninvasive methods of fibrosis evaluation should permit more frequent monitoring.

Summary Background and objectives The therapy and outcome of HIV infection have dramatically changed over the last 15 years, resulting in a change in renal complications. This study analyzed the characteristics of HIV-infected patients and biopsy-proven tubulointerstitial nephropathies to define disease patterns and therapeutic implications. Design, setting, participants, & measurements A clinico-pathologic retrospective study of 59 consecutive renal biopsies showing predominant tubular and/or interstitial lesions in HIV-infected patients referred to the nephrology department between 1995 and 2011 was performed. HIV-associated nephropathy and vascular diseases were excluded from the study. Results Tubulointerstitial nephropathies accounted for 26.6% of 222 native renal biopsies performed in HIV-infected patients. Two pathologic groups were analyzed, tubulopathy and interstitial nephritis, which represented 49% and 51% of tubulointerstitial nephropathies, respectively. Most patients presented with AKI (76.3%) and high-grade proteinuria (57.7%). Drug-related nephrotoxicity was the leading cause (52.5%). Alternative etiologies included infections (15.2%), dysimmune disorders (8.5%), malignancies (3.4%), and chronic (10.2%) and acute (10.2%) tubulointerstitial nephropathies of undetermined origin. Tubulopathy was strongly associated with antiretroviral drug toxicity (75.9%) and mostly caused by tenofovir (55.2%), which was associated with proximal tubular dysfunction (87.5%), overt Fanconi’s syndrome (37.5%), and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (12.5%). Interstitial nephritis was associated with a broader spectrum of pathologic lesions and etiologies. Conclusions In this series, tubulointerstitial nephropathies accounted for 26.6% of renal diseases in HIV-infected patients. Considering the therapeutic implications of diagnoses of drug toxicity, infection, and dysimmune syndromes, this study underscores the importance of monitoring renal parameters in HIV-infected patients and points to the relevance of kidney biopsy to allow an accurate diagnosis.

IntroductionGender differences in antiretroviral therapy (ART) outcomes are critical in sub-Saharan Africa. We assessed the association between gender and virologic failure among adult patients treated in a public routine clinic (one of the largest in West Africa) in Burkina Faso.MethodsWe performed a case-control study between July and October 2012 among patients who had received ART at the Bobo Dioulasso Day Care Unit. Patients were eligible if they were 15 years or older, positive for HIV-1 or HIV-1+2, and on first-line ART for at least six months. Cases were all patients with two consecutive HIV loads >1000 copies/mL (Biocentric Generic or Abbott Real Time assays), or one HIV load >1000 copies/mL associated with immunologic or clinical failure criteria. Controls were all patients who only had HIV loads <300 copies/mL. The association between gender and virologic failure was assessed using a multivariate logistic regression, adjusted on age, level of education, baseline CD4+ T cell count, first and current antiretroviral regimens and time on ART.ResultsOf 2303 patients (74.2% women; median age: 40 years; median time on ART: 34 months), 172 had virologic failure and 2131 had virologic success. Among the former, 130 (75.6%) had confirmed virologic failure, 38 (22.1%) had viro-immunologic failure, and four (2.3%) had viro-clinical failure. The proportion of men was significantly higher among the cases than among the controls (37.2% vs. 24.9%; p<0.001). Compared to controls, cases were also younger, more immunodeficient at ART initiation, less likely to receive a protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral regimen and had spent a longer period of time on ART. After adjustment, male gender remained strongly associated with virologic failure (odds ratio 2.52, 95% CI: 1.77–3.60; p<0.001).ConclusionsMen on ART appeared more vulnerable to virologic failure than women. Additional studies are needed to confirm the poorer prognosis of men in this setting and to determine the causes for their vulnerability in order to optimize HIV care. From now on, efforts should be made to support the adherence of men to ART in the African setting.

No abstract

A review of the hospital charts for 788 patients treated in 19 public and private clinics in Cameroon showed that clinical follow-up visits, biologic follow-up visits, and drug supply were irregular and that many patients interrupted treatment. Virological and immunologic effectiveness of therapy was as expected in patients for whom results were available.