BackgroundRwanda reported significant reductions in malaria burden following scale up of control intervention from 2005 to 2010. This study sought to; measure malaria prevalence, describe spatial malaria clustering and investigate for malaria risk factors among health-centre-presumed malaria cases and their household members in Eastern Rwanda.MethodsA two-stage health centre and household-based survey was conducted in Ruhuha sector, Eastern Rwanda from April to October 2011. At the health centre, data, including malaria diagnosis and individual level malaria risk factors, was collected. At households of these Index cases, a follow-up survey, including malaria screening for all household members and collecting household level malaria risk factor data, was conducted.ResultsMalaria prevalence among health centre attendees was 22.8%. At the household level, 90 households (out of 520) had at least one malaria-infected member and the overall malaria prevalence for the 2634 household members screened was 5.1%. Among health centre attendees, the age group 5–15 years was significantly associated with an increased malaria risk and a reported ownership of ≥4 bednets was significantly associated with a reduced malaria risk. At the household level, age groups 5–15 and >15 years and being associated with a malaria positive index case were associated with an increased malaria risk, while an observed ownership of ≥4 bednets was associated with a malaria risk-protective effect. Significant spatial malaria clustering among household cases with clusters located close to water- based agro-ecosystems was observed.ConclusionsMalaria prevalence was significantly higher among health centre attendees and their household members in an area with significant household spatial malaria clustering. Circle surveillance involving passive case finding at health centres and proactive case detection in households can be a powerful tool for identifying household level malaria burden, risk factors and clustering.

Background Surgical Site Infections (SSI) are the most reported health acquired infection and common surgical complication in both developed and developing countries. In developing countries such as Rwanda, there is a paucity of published reports on the pattern of SSI, therefore this study aimed at assessing the incidence, risk factors and the antibiotic profile of pathogens responsible of SSI. Methods This prospective study included 294 patients admitted between October 10, 2017 and February 12, 2018 to the surgical department of the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali. Patients data were collected using a structured and pretested questionnaire in English version. Regular follow-up was maintained until at least 30 days postoperatively. Samples were collected from suspected wounds and identified using different bacteria culture media. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software word version 20.0. P -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The overall incidence of SSI was 10.9%. The associated risk factors were found to be an increased age, ASA class, wound classification, skills and experience of the surgeon, longer duration of surgery (> 2 h), prolonged duration of hospital stay, blood transfusion and emergency surgery. The most common pathogens isolated were Klebsiella ssp (55%), followed by Escherichia coli (15%) and Proteus ssp (12%), Acinectobacter (9%), Staphylococcus aureus (6%) and coagulase-negative staphylococc i (3%).The pathogens revealed different levels of antibiotic resistance; amoxy-clavilinic acid (98.8%), gentamicin (92.6%), ciprofloxacin (78.1%) and ceftriaxone (53.3%). On the other hand, Amikacin and imipinem were the only two most effective antibiotics for all isolated pathogens with 100% sensitivity. Conclusion SSI incidence rate was revealed to be within acceptable international ranges. However, multi drug resistance was seen in half of the isolates leaving clinicians with few choices of drugs for the treatment of patients with SSI. Periodic surveillance of bacteria and antibiotic susceptibility coupled with the implementation of strict protocol for antibiotic administration and operative room regulations are important to minimize the burden of SSI with resistant bacteria pathogens.

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an imminent threat to modern medicine. As the efficacy of treatment regimens is reduced, mortality and morbidity attributed to infectious diseases is expected to rise dramatically across the globe. Antimicrobial stewardship and good prescription practices are critical to conserving available therapeutics; it is appropriate, therefore, to appraise our attitudes and knowledge of antimicrobial resistance, particularly for the future healthcare practitioners. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study that was conducted among 282 medicals, dental and pharmacy students from the University of Rwanda. Questionnaires were used to collect data from the 4th to 29th March 2017. Results: Students from Level 3 to level 6 have demonstrated a good knowledge on antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance. Generally, 95% (n = 218) agreed that the inappropriate use of antibiotics could lead to antibiotic resistance. It was found that 96% (n = 220) of the respondents had heard about AMR outside their degree courses. 49% (n = 112) of the participants reported that they are able to purchase antibiotics without a prescription. 96% (n = 220) agreed that it was important for healthcare students to be knowledgeable about antimicrobial resistance. Perhaps most surprisingly, it was found that 83% (n = 191) of participants were unfamiliar with the concept of antimicrobial stewardship and 49% (n = 21) had not yet discussed antimicrobial resistance as part of their education, albeit only 1% (n = 3) was completely unfamiliar with the term. Furthermore, 38% (n = 86) did not support that the antibiotics were overused in Rwanda, 23% (n = 10) did not agree that inappropriate antimicrobial use contributed to antimicrobial resistance, and 50% (n = 22) of participants agreed that antibiotics were indicated in the treatment of pain and inflammation.

Altered monocyte differentiation and effector functions characterize immune pathogenesis of tuberculosis. IL-7 is an important factor for proliferation of T cells and impaired IL-7 sensitivity due to decreased IL-7 receptor α-chain (IL-7Rα) expression was found in patients with acute tuberculosis. Peripheral blood monocytes have moderate IL-7Rα expression and increased IL-7Rα levels were described for inflammatory diseases. In this study, we investigated a potential role of IL-7 and IL-7Rα expression for monocyte functions in tuberculosis. We analyzed the phenotype of monocytes in the blood from tuberculosis patients (n = 33), asymptomatic contacts of tuberculosis patients (contacts; n = 30), and healthy controls (n = 20) from Ghana by multicolor flow cytometry. Mycobacterial components were analyzed for their capacity to induce IL-7Rα expression in monocytes. Functional effects of monocyte to IL-7 were measured during signaling and by using an antimycobacterial in vitro kill assay. Monocytes were more frequent in peripheral blood from patients with tuberculosis and especially higher proportions of CD14+/CD16+ (M1/2) monocytes with increased PD-L1 expression characterized acute tuberculosis. IL-7Rα expression was decreased particularly on M1/2 monocytes from patients with tuberculosis and aberrant low expression IL-7Rα correlated with high PD-L1 levels. Constitutive low pSTAT5 levels of monocytes ex vivo and impaired IL-7 response confirmed functionally decreased monocyte IL-7 sensitivity of patients with tuberculosis. Mycobacteria and mycobacterial cell wall components induced IL-7 receptor expression in monocytes and IL-7 boosted mycobacterial killing by monocyte-derived macrophages in vitro. We demonstrated impaired monocyte IL-7 receptor expression as well as IL-7 sensitivity in tuberculosis with potential effects on antimycobacterial effector functions.