Mixed-effect modeling was used to compare the population pharmacokinetics of 2 formulations of cyclosporine in patients. An open-label, multicenter, conversion study in stable, 6-month post-renal allograft recipients was conducted to compare the safety and pharmacokinetics of oral Pliva Cyclosporine Soft Gelatin Capsules (USP Modified) with Neoral (cyclosporine soft gelatin capsules, USP Modified) in stable post-renal transplant patients. Blood samples were collected predose and for 12 hours postdose on days 1, 14, 15, 28, and 29. Whole-blood samples were analyzed for cyclosporine using high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectroscopy. Estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters were generated using noncompartmental and population compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. Moreover, the effects of demographic factors on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine were evaluated using the nonlinear mixed-effects modeling program NONMEM. The rate and extent of bioavailability of cyclosporine did not differ between Pliva Cyclosporine Soft Gelatin Capsules and Neoral. In the final model, gender and actual body weight significantly affected the central and peripheral volumes of distribution. In addition, the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine was defined robustly in this patient population using population pharmacokinetic approaches. Results indicate that the Pliva Cyclosporine Soft Gelatin Capsules and Neoral are bioequivalent when administered to renal transplant patients. Pliva Cyclosporine Soft Gelatin Capsules can then be substituted for Neoral in stabilized patients without anticipating dose adjustments.

Two randomized, open-label clinical studies involving healthy female volunteers aged 18-45 years (study 1, N = 32; study 2, N = 40) are described, which characterize the pharmacokinetics and steady-state dosage regimen performance of 2 novel, modified-release tranexamic acid tablet formulations. The objective of these studies was to identify the optimum product formulation to advance into late-phase clinical trials for heavy menstrual bleeding. For study 1, participants received single 1.3-g doses (2 650-mg tablets) of tranexamic acid modified-immediate-release (MIR) and tranexamic acid delayed-release (DR) formulations under fasting conditions compared with nonfasting conditions (after breakfast). For study 2, participants received tranexamic acid MIR or tranexamic acid DR as a single 1.3-g dose followed by a dosage regimen of 1.3 g every 8 hours for 5 days. Plasma tranexamic acid concentrations reached minimum effective levels (≥5 μg/mL) within 1.5 hours and within 3 hours after a 1.3-g tranexamic acid MIR and tranexamic acid DR dose, respectively. Food did not appreciably influence tranexamic acid MIR pharmacokinetics, whereas a high-fat meal significantly lowered the maximum concentration produced with tranexamic acid DR. Peak systemic exposure and maintenance of plasma tranexamic acid concentrations within the therapeutic range (5-15 μg/mL) were optimally achieved with 1.3 g of the MIR formulation dosed every 8 hours. The MIR and DR formulations were well tolerated. Peak-to-trough steady-state performance of the tranexamic acid MIR 1.3-g product (dosed every 8 hours, or 3 times daily, for up to 5 days) supported its advancement to late-phase clinical trials in women with heavy menstrual bleeding.

Piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) is frequently used to treat severe hospital-acquired infections in children. We performed a single-center, pharmacokinetic (PK) trial of TZP in children ranging in age from 2 months to 6 years from various clinical subpopulations. Children who were on TZP per the standard of care were prospectively included and assigned to receive a dose of 80 mg/kg of body weight every 6 h infused over 2 h (ages 2 to 5 months) or a dose of 90 mg/kg every 8 h infused over 4 h (ages 6 months to 6 years). Separate population PK models were developed for piperacillin and tazobactam using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Optimal dosing was judged based on the ability to maintain free piperacillin concentrations above the piperacillin MIC for enterobacteria and Pseudomonas aeruginosa for ≥50% of the dosing interval. Any untoward event occurring during treatment was collected as an adverse event. A total of 79 children contributed 174 PK samples. The median (range) age and weight were 1.7 years (2 months to 6 years) and 11.4 kg (3.8 to 27.6 kg), respectively. A 2-compartment model with first-order elimination best described the piperacillin and tazobactam data. Both final population PK models included weight and concomitant furosemide administration on clearance and weight on the volume of distribution of the central compartment. The optimal dosing regimens in children with normal renal function, based on the piperacillin component, were 75 mg/kg/dose every 4 h infused over 0.5 h in infants ages 2 to ≤6 months and 130 mg/kg/dose every 8 h infused over 4 h in children ages >6 months to 6 years against bacteria with MICs up to 16 mg/liter. A total of 44 children (49%) had ≥1 adverse event, with 3 of these (site infiltrations) considered definitely associated with the extended infusions.

The objective of the present study was to determine the pharmacokinetics and efficacies of liposomal and conventional formulations of tobramycin against Burkholderia cepacia in a model of chronic lung infection. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were inoculated intratracheally with 10 6 CFU of a very resistant strain of B. cepacia (strain BC 1368; MIC, 128 g/ml) to establish lung infection. A 1,200-g dose of tobramycin was administered intratracheally as a liposomal formulation and as a conventional formulation. Rats were anesthetized and exsanguinated by cardiac puncture at different times over 24 h to assess pulmonary tobramycin concentrations and the number of residual CFU. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by using a two-compartment model with NONMEM. The mean half-life at the ␤ phase (t 1/2␤ ) and the pulmonary exposure (the area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) of liposomal tobramycin were 19.7 h (coefficient of variation [CV], 24.2%) and 6,811 g ⅐ h/lungs (CV, 19.7%), respectively. The pharmacokinetics of conventional tobramycin were statistically different, with a t 1/2␤ and AUC of 12.9 h (CV, 31.4%) and 821 g ⅐ h/lungs (CV, 15.0%), respectively. Pearson chi-square analyses were performed on residual CFU data distributed in the following categories: <10 3 , 10 3 to 10 5 , and >10 5 . Differences in CFU data between formulations showed a statistical trend (P < 0.10) when data from all time points were used, and statistically significant differences were found after 12 h (P < 0.05), with greater eradication achieved with the liposomal formulation. In conclusion, intratracheal administration of tobramycin in liposomes was associated with marked changes in the pharmacokinetics of the drug in the lung and an apparent trend for a prolonged efficacy against B. cepacia. These results support the hypothesis that inhalation of liposomal tobramycin may improve the management of chronic pulmonary infections caused by resistant bacteria in patients with cystic fibrosis.Burkholderia cepacia is recognized as a pathogen of increasing importance, particularly in immunocompromised hosts (13) and cystic fibrosis patients (11,15). Treatment of B. cepacia infections is difficult because of its high-level resistance to multiple antibiotics. Efficient resistance mechanisms such as a decreased outer membrane permeability (16, 18) and a very active antibiotic efflux pump (4) render the treatment of B. cepacia pulmonary infections a challenge.Local administration of antibiotics has the advantage of delivering drug at the site of infection, reducing in certain cases unnecessary systemic exposure. Despite the use of potent antibiotics in aerosolized solutions or suspensions, total eradication of microorganisms is rarely achieved in cystic fibrosis patients (12,15,19,21). Many researchers have demonstrated that the disposition of gentamicin, amikacin, or tobramycin markedly changes when these antibiotics are administered in liposomal forms (5,6,8,9,17). Moreover, encapsulation of drugs in liposomes has often resulted in imp...

Ontamalimab (SHP647) is a fully human, immunoglobulin G2, antihuman mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule‐1 (MAdCAM‐1) monoclonal antibody being developed for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis was conducted using clinical phase 2 study data to evaluate the PK and PD of ontamalimab following subcutaneous administrations of 7.5, 22.5, 75, and 225 mg every 4 weeks in patients with moderate to severe UC or CD. A total of 440 patients with UC (n = 249; 56.6%) or CD (n = 191; 43.4%) were included in the analysis. A 2‐compartment model with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination adequately characterized concentration‐time profiles of ontamalimab. The apparent clearance and volume of distribution were 0.0127 L/h (0.305 L/day) and 6.53 L, respectively. Apparent clearance and volume of distribution were mainly dependent on baseline albumin and body weight, respectively. No differences in the PK properties of ontamalimab were observed between patients with UC or CD. The presence of antidrug antibodies did not impact the PK of ontamalimab. Nonlinear elimination occurred at very low concentrations and was unlikely to contribute to the elimination half‐life under steady‐state conditions. A linear PK/PD model described the relationship between ontamalimab and free MAdCAM‐1. Minimum concentrations of ontamalimab at steady state following 75 mg every 4 weeks were associated with >95% suppression of circulating free MAdCAM‐1. The PK/PD properties characterized support phase 3 testing in UC and CD.