BACKGROUND: Improving walking capacity is a key objective of post-stroke rehabilitation. Evidence describing the quality and protocols of standardized tools for assessing walking capacity can facilitate their implementation. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize existing literature describing test protocols and measurement properties of distance-limited walk tests in people post-stroke. METHODS: Electronic database searches were completed in 2017. Records were screened and appraised for quality. RESULTS: Data were extracted from 43 eligible articles. Among the 12 walk tests identified, the 10-metre walk test (10mWT) at a comfortable pace was most commonly evaluated. Sixty-three unique protocols at comfortable and fast paces were identified. Walking pace and walkway surface, but not walkway length, influenced walking speed. Intraclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.80–0.99 across walk tests. Measurement error values ranged from 0.04–0.40 and 0.06 to 0.20 for the 10mWT at comfortable and fast and paces, respectively. Across walk tests, performance was most frequently correlated with measures of strength, balance, and physical activity (r = 0.26-0.8, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The 10mWT has the most evidence of reliability and validity. Findings indicate that studies that include people with severe walking deficits, in acute and subacute phases of recovery, with improved quality of reporting, are needed.

The use of collaborative health research approaches, such as integrated knowledge translation (IKT), was challenged during the COVID-19 pandemic due to physical distancing measures and transition to virtual platforms. As IKT trainees (i.e. graduate students, postdoctoral scholars) within the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network (IKTRN), we experienced several changes and adaptations to our daily routine, work and research environments due to the rapid transition to virtual platforms. While there was an increased capacity to communicate at local, national and international levels, gaps in equitable access to training and partnership opportunities at universities and organizations have emerged. This essay explores the experiences and reflections of 16 IKTRN trainees during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic at the micro (individual), meso (organizational) and macro (system) levels. The micro level, or individual experiences, focuses on topics of self-care (taking care of oneself for physical and mental well-being), maintaining research activities and productivity, and leisure (social engagement and taking time for oneself ), while conducting IKT research during the pandemic. At the meso level, the role of programmes and organizations explores whether and how institutions were able to adapt and continue research and/or partnerships during the pandemic. At the macro level, we discuss implications for policies to support IKT trainees and research, during and beyond emergency situations. Themes were identified that intersected across all levels, which included (i) equitable access to training and partnerships; (ii) capacity for reflexivity; (iii) embracing changing opportunities; and (iv) strengthening collaborative relationships. These intersecting themes represent ways of encouraging sustainable and equitable improvements towards establishing and maintaining collaborative health research approaches. This essay is a summary of our collective experiences and aims to provide suggestions on how organizations and universities can support future trainees conducting collaborative research. Thus, we hope to inform more equitable and sustainable collaborative health research approaches and training in the post-pandemic era.

Introduction: Despite aerobic exercise (AE) testing being a key recommendation for stroke rehabilitation, less than half of physical therapists working with individuals post-stroke perform this practice. Concern for adverse cardiovascular events and inadequate guidance on how to conduct AE testing for individuals with stroke and comorbidity are key barriers. This review aims to describe submaximal AE testing protocols with evidence of safety, defined as less than 11% occurrence of serious adverse events, for people with subacute stroke and comorbidity. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus were searched from inception to October 29, 2020. Published studies that involved submaximal AE testing with individuals with subacute stroke and reported on adverse events during testing were included. Two reviewers independently conducted title and abstract, and full-text screening. One reviewer conducted data extraction, verified by a second reviewer. Results: Sixteen studies involving 595 participants were included. Hypertension (35%), cardiovascular disease (14%) and atrial fibrillation (8%) were the most common cardiovascular comorbidities, while, diabetes (25%), dyslipidemia (23%) and smoking history (11%) were the most common general comorbidities affecting participants with stroke. Evidence of safety for individuals with stroke and comorbidity was found for incremental bicycle (n=5), recumbent stepper (n=3), body weight support treadmill (n=1) and upper extremity ergometer (n=1) protocols; constant load bicycle (n=1) and body weight support treadmill (n=1) protocols; and field (n=10) protocols. Heart rate (95%), blood pressure (82%) and oxygen consumption (72%) monitoring were most frequently done. Test termination criteria based on volition/fatigue (59%) and heart rate (55%) were most commonly reported. Conclusion: A range of submaximal AE testing protocols utilizing diverse exercise modalities can be safely conducted on people with subacute stroke and comorbid conditions that are perceived to increase the risk for serious adverse events. These protocols can be used to guide the development of more specific clinical practice guidelines for conducting AE testing on individuals with stroke and comorbidity.

No abstract