Background Despite significant policy concerns about the role of inpatient resource utilization on rising medical costs, little information is provided to residents regarding their practice patterns and the effect on resource use. Improved knowledge about their practice patterns and costs might reduce resource utilization and better prepare physicians for today's health care market. Methods We surveyed residents in the internal medicine residency at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. Based on needs identified via the survey, discussions with experts, and a literature review, a curriculum was created to help increase residents' knowledge about benchmarking their own practice patterns and using objective performance measures in the health care market. Results The response rate to our survey was 67%. Only 37% of residents reported receiving any feedback on their utilization of resources, and only 20% reported receiving feedback regularly. Even fewer (16%) developed, with their attending physician, a concrete improvement plan for resource use. A feedback program was developed that included automatic review of the electronic medical record to provide trainee-specific feedback on resource utilization and outcomes of care including number of laboratory tests per patient day, laboratory cost per patient day, computed tomography scan ordering rate, length of stay, and 14-day readmission rate. Results were benchmarked against those of peers on the same service. Objective feedback was provided biweekly by the attending physician, who also created an action plan with the residents. In addition, an integrated didactic curriculum was provided to all trainees on the hospitalist service on a biweekly basis. Conclusions Interns and residents do not routinely receive feedback on their resource utilization or ways to improve efficiency. A method for providing objective data on individual resource utilization in combination with a structured curriculum can be implemented to help improve resident knowledge and practice. Ongoing work will test the impact on resource utilization and outcomes.
Although there is a growing body of literature describing the benefits of creative arts in health care, research in this area is limited. This article describes an exploratory qualitative research study that examines the potential benefits of an arts program on an inpatient oncology unit located in a major medical center in New England. Semistructured interviews of seven patients and seven nurses who cared for these patients were conducted following participation in an established arts program. Benefits included improved patient coping with pain, improved nursepatient communication, and improved attitude toward hospitalization.If the purpose of art is to nourish the spirit, what more appropriate place to find it than in a hospital, where our spirit may encounter its most critical moments.
This qualitative study describes the psychological responses of Korean participants with terminal cancer (stages III-IV) from time of diagnosis to death. Eighteen participants, ages 48 to 73, were interviewed at various phases of dying. Using analytic induction, three categories (nonacceptance, resignation, submission), characteristic patterns of responses over the course of illness and typical responses within categories were generated. Nonaccepters denied the possibility of death while struggling to live; their typical response was resistance. Resigners displayed sorrow, thoughts about their destiny, and growing acceptance of their fate. Their typical response was nonresistance. Submitters were shocked initially, searched for God's will, and prepared for death with hope. Their typical response was hopeful that God would care for them and their families. Participants' ages, physical pain, burden to family, and beliefs played important roles in the patterns of responses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.