BackgroundProspective studies demonstrate that over one‐third of patients undergoing standard suture closure of laparotomy wounds will develop incisional hernias (IHs). Whilst prophylactic mesh has been demonstrated to decrease IH rates in clean laparotomy wounds, mesh has been associated with high rates of seroma formation (>30%), infection (>10%) and pain, discouraging many surgeons from using mesh, especially combined with intestinal surgery. The aim of this study is to review the experience of a single colorectal surgeon who, after noting high IH rates in his own patients, started placing prophylactic mesh routinely in patients judged to be at high risk of IH.MethodsThe records of all patients undergoing bowel resections and ileostomy closure by one surgeon from 2008 to 2018 were independently retrospectively analysed.ResultsOf the 935 procedures identified, 662 patients underwent midline laparotomy with bowel resection and 273 patients underwent closure of loop ileostomy. Mesh was placed prophylactically in 221 (23.6%) of 935 procedures. Comparing the mesh and non‐mesh groups, wound infections occurred in nine (4.1%) versus 23 (3.2%) (P = 0.53), seromas occurred in nine (4.1%) versus six (0.8%) (P = 0.003) and chronic pain was noted in 12 (5.4%) versus 17 (2.4%) (P = 0.04). The mean follow‐up was 33 months in both the mesh and non‐mesh groups. IHs have occurred in three (1.3%) of the mesh group compared to 95 (13.3%) of the non‐mesh group procedures (P = 0.0001).ConclusionIn colorectal operations, prophylactic mesh decreases the risk of IH without prohibitive complications.

Aim:The role of germline testing in prostate cancer is evolving and knowledge of an individual's genetic profile may be used to guide not only an assessment of their familial risk but also have prognostic and therapeutic implications. Although international guidelines have incorporated recommendations for germline testing in prostate cancer, there is little Australian data to guide referrals. The aim of this study is to review the frequency of relevant pathogenic mutations in an Australian center, their associated clinical factors and clinical impact. Methods:We conducted a single-center retrospective review of men with prostate cancer that undertook prospective germline testing using a targeted next generation sequencing panel. Results:Results for 100 men were analyzed. Median age at diagnosis was 62 years (range 43-84); 92% had metastatic disease at referral. A pathogenic mutation was confirmed in 9%, a likely pathogenic variant in 2% and a variant of uncertain significance in 15%. Age ≤60 years was associated with an increased risk for a pathogenic germline variant (P = 0.0096). Two of the nine (22%) with pathogenic variants went on to receive targeted treatment. Conclusions:In this single center study, the incidence of germline mutations in genes associated with DNA-repair was consistent with rates seen previously published international series of men with metastatic disease. A pathogenic variant was only seen in one patient >60 years of age and no man referred solely on the basis of age or high-risk localized disease had a relevant finding. K E Y W O R D Sgenetics, germline, prostate cancer

BackgroundAt present in Australia women are not routinely, systematically informed of the risks of childbirth.AimsIt is hoped this presentation of the perspective of some women who suffer unexpected obstetric complications will encourage change.Materials and MethodsThe experience of women involved in obstetric medicolegal reports prepared by a colorectal surgeon over ten years is analysed.ResultsTwenty women were identified. Sixteen had vaginal deliveries. All 16 suffered third or fourth‐degree tears, six developed rectovaginal fistulae, six required stomas and 11 developed faecal incontinence. Of the four women who delivered by caesarean section, there were two post‐operative caecal perforations, one unrecognised small bowel enterotomy, and one patient developed sepsis due to an infected haematoma. Seventeen of the 20 women were noted to suffer psychological sequalae. None of the women recollected being warned of the complication they suffered, and there was no record of such warnings in their medical records.ConclusionInformed written ‘consent’ for natural vaginal delivery is, understandably, a contentious topic. Although learning from medicolegal cases may go against the grain, as medical professionals it is very difficult to ethically justify the status quo, where women are not routinely simply informed of the risks of childbirth. This is not fair. Even if informing women does not decrease the incidence of complications, the women who subsequently suffer these complications may well handle them much better, recognising they could occur.